Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> The GOOPS macros (e.g. define-method) are not hygenic, and are not > evaluated in the defining module, but rather the current one. Ah, it sounds as a good enhancement of hygenic macros over CL-sytle macros. As guile provides both of them, sometimes i'm confused of which one to use. Is it a good idea to use only hygenic macros? Anyway, R5RS has defined only hygenic macros. > The Guile module system does not (yet? Perhaps never since r6rs will > have an incompatible module system that deals with such things, and > there isn't much point to pushing the guile system except for > compatibility after r6rs) deal with macros very well. Ugh, so we have to wait... ps. Supposed i defined a syntax `when', if i want to check out what `when' is, either a function, macro, or syntax, like, guile> when ERROR: invalid syntax when ABORT: (misc-error) guile> For several times at first, this made me think that i might have done some wrong in the definition of `when', but i haven't actually. This seems a little weird. Isn't it more intuitive to prompt, say, guile> when #<syntax! when> guile> Or is it also an undefined behaviour in the standards? And, the rule of placing docstring at the first line in the definition body, so as to be able to retrieve later by (help name), doesn't apply to a syntax definition? -- William _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
