Han-Wen Nienhuys:
Hi, I'm still confused and irritated that the order of execution
in quasiquote lists are not (in my opinion) proper. I wrote about
this to this list some time ago, and got the expected answer that
the scheme standard does not specify the order.
However, there is nothing wrong
release notes:
directory mtime restoration requires another tree walk, sigh.
on the bright side, 1.0.0 finally achieved!
thi
README excerpt:
This directory contains MMCI (multi-method check-in), a program
that abstracts the "cvs add" procedure to also handle RCS files
and Emacs-styl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
>
>> There was a memory leak in the display routines, which was recently
>> fixed in the CVS branch.
>
> It's here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-11/msg00021.html .
> You seem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> There have also been a few attempts at a Guile VM, and compiling for
>> the VM, in case that is of interest to you.
>
> Indeed, I'm still slowly trying to revive Guile-VM, written by
> Keishude Nishida 5
Zeeshan Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>GMP? What is that? :)
The GNU multiprecision arithmetic library, which is a dependency of
Guile 1.7/CVS.
> I don't rememeber needing to install anything other than what was
> already installed by sb/maemo but it was a few months ago and i can
> be wro
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 14:17 -0500, Julian Graham wrote:
> It looks like you're trying to do some kind of graphics programming
> with Guile but don't have the right libraries loaded
> ("filled-triangle" is not, to the best of my knowledge, part of R5RS).
> Perhaps you're missing a use-modules expre
It looks like you're trying to do some kind of graphics programming
with Guile but don't have the right libraries loaded
("filled-triangle" is not, to the best of my knowledge, part of R5RS).
Perhaps you're missing a use-modules expression?
It would be helpful to know more about what you're tryin
Hi,
I am learning guile and scheme. I want to draw a triangle, but the
machine always responsed me a warning. see below
guile>(define test-bb(filled-triangle 0 1 0 -1 1 -1))
standard input:10:4: In expession (filled-triangle 0 1 ...):
standard input:10:4: Unbound variable: filled-triangle
> I think it is wise not to change this. If GUILE starts specifying a
> certain execution order, people will rely on this order, which will
> guarantees that their code will break on other Schemes.
So lets hack into the main scheme servers and change R5RS to match!
I kid, I kid...
Regards,
Jon
Hey!
> For core Guile no, I guess not. But I would personally like a
> Hildon-enhanced guile-gnome as well, so that I can play with writing
> small graphical apps. I think this means adding defs for the Hildon
> API to the existing gtk/gnome defs, and then rebuilding guile-gnome.
Oh! guile-g
Hello Neil,
On 01-03, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Holger Blasum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps it would make sense for the debugger to show the source
> position automatically on each step? What do you think?
At least gdb, pydb (python) and ocamldebug (ocd) do this. But any
verbosity trade-offs
Zeeshan Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/7/06, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is anyone else interested in this, or even already working on it?
>
> Yes! i am interested. But is there anything that needs to be done
> for it?
For core Guile no, I guess not. But I wo
Hello,
On 1/7/06, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone else interested in this, or even already working on it?
Yes! i am interested. But is there anything that needs to be done
for it? I mean i was able to build/run guile without any problems in
scratchbox/maemo env. Would you w
Is anyone else interested in this, or even already working on it?
Neil
___
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
There has not been a resounding consensus for any of the proposals
discussed so far, so here is another possibility.
The basic idea behind all of the previous proposals was to create some
kind of config when a package was installed, such that other Guile
code would be able to find that package aut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> How so? Given that you're about to do a (use-modules (whatnot)), I
>> can't see that also doing (initialize-packages "whatnot") will make a
>> significant difference.
>
> Because people haven't been doing s
16 matches
Mail list logo
