Re: guile 3 update, june 2018 edition

Greetings Andy! Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted to give an update on Guile 3 developments. Last note was > here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2018-04/msg4.html > > The news is that the VM has been completely converted over to call out > to the Guile r

Re: guile 3 update, june 2018 edition

Ok! now getting past the "make -j" issue, but I'm still getting a segfault. Here is a backtrace from the core dump. Line 25: #25 0x7efeb518b09f in scm_error (key=0x563599bbb120, subr=subr@entry=0x0, message=message@entry=0x7efeb521c0cd "Unbound variable: ~S", args=0x563599f8f260, rest=

Re: guile 3 update, june 2018 edition

dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote: > Ok! now getting past the "make -j" issue, but I'm still getting a segfault. And now commit e6461cf1b2b63e3ec9a2867731742db552b61b71 has gotten past the segfault. Wooo! -Dale

RE: GNU Guile 2.9.9 Released [beta]

> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.9.9. When attempting to build on a Debian Jessie 32bit arm system, gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u2) 4.9.2 I'm working on updating this system to Debian Stable, but it might require wiping it and doing a fresh install.

%module-public-interface

(Sorry for the non-plain-test formatting, haven't the new mailer interface from Spectrum yet. Ugh.) I'm porting some old code to 3.0 and I've come across this: (define-module (bobotpp bot)) (set-module-uses! %module-public-interface (list (module-ref (resolve-mo

Re: %module-public-interface

Thanks Andy! Sneek is much happer now. -Dale -From: "Andy Wingo" To: dsm...@roadrunner.com Cc: "guile-devel@gnu.org" Sent: Wednesday January 15 2020 2:59:53PM Subject: Re: %module-public-interface On Wed 15 Jan 2020 07:50, dsm...@roadrunn

debug enable seems broken in 3.0

This ought to work, right? From a fresh 3.0 install from tarball on Debian Buster: $ guile GNU Guile 3.0.0 Copyright (C) 1995-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This

Re: debug enable seems broken in 3.0

From: "Linus Björnstam" * > There is no 'debug options, as the error says. Read more here: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Debug-Options.html [1] Links: -- [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Debug-Options.html#index-debug_002denable

MIssing scm_memory_error

In Guile 3.0 (and probably earlier) scm_memory_error has gone away, with no mention of a replacement in NEWS. -Dale

RE: MIssing scm_memory_error

Looks like the replacement is scm_report_out_of_memory() -Dale -From: dsm...@roadrunner.com To: "guile-devel@gnu.org" Cc: Sent: Sunday January 19 2020 5:48:10PM Subject: MIssing scm_memory_error In Guile 3.0 (and probably earlier) scm_mem

RE: bug#39118: Segfault while building on 64-bit Cygwin

Pretty sure that the missing readline symbol is because the macos readline is being used/found instead of GNU readline. -Dale -From: "John Cowan" To: "Ludovic Courtès" Cc: 39...@debbugs.gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday January 24 2

Re: MIssing scm_memory_error

Thanks! The replacement for scm_memory_error seems to be scm_report_out_of_memory. Maybe keep SCM_MEMORY_ERROR but have it expand to scm_report_out_of_memory instead? -Dale -From: "Ludovic Courtès" To: dsm...@roa

Re: Replace ltdl with GLib's GModule

> From: "Duy Nguyen" > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:24 AM Mike Gran wrote: > > > > In a fit of pique, I pushed a new branch of Guile to the repo > > called wip-replace-ltdl-with-gmodule. It replaces the dynamic linking > > library libltdl from libtool with the analagous library GModule > > fr

RE: Replace ltdl with GLib's GModule

Looks like (based on ldd output) that it depends on libglib, libpthread, and libpcre beyond all that libltdl also uses. -Dale

Cross compiled guile 3.0.2 "Illegal instruction" on 32bit arm.

I'm attempting to use buildroot to cross compile guile 3.0.2 for 32bit arm (rpi3). Note that guile runs fine with the jit disabled by GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=-1 When guile starts, I get an "Illegal instruction". # GUILE_JIT_LOG=3 guile jit: allocated code arena, 0x74f43000-0x74f83000 jit: mcode: 0x7

Re: a cookbook

> From: "Vijay Marupudi" > To: "Catonano", "guile-devel" > Subject: Re: a cookbook > > Is there any interest/possibility to have such a cookbook hosted > > within the Guile official documentation (as it is for Guix) ? > I personally think that a Cookbook should be an independent effort, > with >

Re: a cookbook

> From: "Vijay Marupudi" > To: "Catonano" > Subject: Re: a cookbook >> I'd like to have continuable exceptions covered, though >> >> Those are the main departure of Guile from more widespread exception >> handling solutions and as far as I can tell something similar is available >> only in Co

Re: compilation error on Apple M1

-From: "Damien Mattei" To: "guile-devel" Cc: Sent: Monday December 26 2022 6:13:42AM Subject: Re: compilation error on Apple M1 > sed: -e: No such file or directory The bsd sed is different than gnu sed. There was a few patches sent out a while

Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation

Noah Lavine wrote: > Hello, > > > From “Organisation of this Manual”: > > > >  *Chapter 6: Guile API Reference* > >       This part of the manual documents the Guile API in > >       functionality-based groups with the Scheme and C interfaces > >       presented side by side. > > > >  *Cha

Re: [PATCH] object->string should return obj immediately while obj is a string

Krister Svanlund wrote: > Shouldn't the function return a string representing the object.rather than > the object itself, even for a string. It should be up to your application > to handle if it's a string imho. > On Jul 3, 2012 2:42 PM, "Nala Ginrut" wrote: > > > hi guys! > > I realized

Re: Help required with exporting and using GOOP generics

Mark H Weaver wrote: > The proper solution is as follows: > > * Every generic function must be defined (using 'define-generic') and > exported from one (and only one) module. > > * Every module that uses a generic function, or adds a method to it (and > that includes slot accessors), m

[no subject]

Well Fouey. I thought I'd try building guile on my old mipsel box before the upcoming release. It failed compiling psyntax-pp. Here is the compile output. I don't have a full build log at this time. This was starting from a git clean -dxf at v2.0.7-321-g254d313 GUILEC ice-9/eval.go wrote

Re:

dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote: > Well Fouey. > > I thought I'd try building guile on my old mipsel box before the upcoming > release. It failed compiling psyntax-pp. Here is the compile output. I > don't have a full build log at this time. This was starting from a git clean > -dxf at >

Re: thinking out loud: wip-rtl, ELF, pages, and mmap

Andy Wingo wrote: ... > Then I realized: why am I doing all of this if the kernel has a virtual > memory system already that does all this for me? > > So I have a new plan, I think. I'll change the linker to always emit > sections and segments that correspond exactly in their on-disk lay

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix memory leak on `realloc' failure

kact...@gnu.org wrote: > From: Dmitry Bogatov > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogatov > --- > libguile/script.c | 8 +++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libguile/script.c b/libguile/script.c > index 052ab8d..7b737f7 100644 > --- a/libguile/script.c > +++

Re: Welcome Mark as new co-maintainer

"Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hello Guilers, > > I’m happy to announce that Mark H. Weaver has now been officially > appointed as Guile co-maintainer by the GNU Project overseers, along > with Andy and myself. > > Mark has been doing excellent work on Guile for several years, > tirelessly lo

Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test

Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: David Kastrup > > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:56:46 +0200 > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > >> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:05:52 +0100 > > >> From: Neil Jerram > > >> > > >> On 2014-06-09 20:32, l...@gnu.org wrote: > > >> > What’s the name of /dev/null o

Re: Bug free programs

Ian Grant wrote: > One may ask what has this to do with scheme? Well, Standard ML can > compose scheme or C code just as easily as it can compose assembler > code. So a Standard ML functor can define a typed template that will > allow one to exchange underling scheme implementations

Re: Guile Assembler

Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > 24 cze 2015 10:34 napisał(a): > > > > > In addition, the module allows me to use the "let" and "let*" forms with > > > multiple values: > > > > > > (let ((a (b c) (values 1 '(2 3 > > > (+ a b c)) > > > > Any chance to see that in Guile? > > The module ac

Current git master build fails on 32bit

Git master is failing to build for me. My old 32bit single core machine. $ git describe v2.1.2-164-gc95a193 $ gcc --version gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2 Here is the error: GUILEC language/ecmascript/impl.go wrote `language/ecmascript/impl.go' GUILEC language/ecmascript/base.go language/ec

Re: Current git master build fails on 32bit

dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote: > Git master is failing to build for me. My old 32bit single core machine. > > $ git describe > v2.1.2-164-gc95a193 > Yey! v2.1.2-200-g7142005 is now (mostly) working. However, make -k check is failing in a few places. Handling EOF seems to be a common them

Re: srfi-1 take and drop seriously broken

Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > 2016-11-20 11:42 GMT+01:00 Jan Synáček : > > > > > >> Please, tell me that this is just a mistake... This can't be true. I > > >> still can't believe it. This is from 2.0.11. Please, tell me that the > > >> implementation is fixed in 2.2. > > >> > > >> Yours tr

Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)

Matt Wette wrote: > > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 5:45 AM, Matt Wette wrote: > > > > > >> On Dec 11, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Matt Wette >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Matt Wette >>> > wrote: > >>> > >>> >

Current git unitialized vars warnings.

The new vector vm code gives me quite a few "possible use uninitialized" warnings. On debian Etch: $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21) Patch attached (I hope). -Dale init-vars.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Unicode ports patch

Mike Gran wrote: > The latest commit 'Add full Unicode capability to ports and the default > reader' 889975e51accb80491af76fc5db980aeb3edd342 adds the majority of > the functionality for non-ASCII strings. > > The commit breaks functions that have to do with locale-specific case > conver

Re: BDW-GC branch updated

Andreas Rottmann wrote: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > Also, there are definite benefits to using a conservative GC for > > libguile, given how tightly it can be integrated with C (e.g., [2]). > > > My main concern is/was that by moving to a conservatice GC, and > _consequentl

Re: wip-array-refactor strikes back

Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu 07 Jan 2010 21:33, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > >> So, Ludo! You seem to be the one to convince. Can I commit that, and > >> then bytecode-subrs? :) > > > > Well, presented this way, I have no other choice but to say yes! ;-) > > > > If th

Re: [PATCH] Fix hanging of popen.test

Neil Jerram wrote: > So my hypothesis now is: > > - some change in the last few months has introduced a dependency of > Guile script startup (specifically including the case where Guile is > run to generate guile-procedures.texi) on srfi-1.scm > > - this makes the build impossible! >

Re: two spaces after sentence + other doc janitorial duties

Andy Wingo wrote: > Heya Ludovic, > > On Fri 02 Jul 2010 14:23, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > Andy Wingo writes: > > > >> On Fri 25 Jun 2010 18:35, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > >> > >>> Normally, texinfo source should have two spaces after each sentence: > >>> > >>>Blah

Re: RFC: Arbitrary-precision floats for Guile

Hans Aberg wrote: > On 1 Feb 2011, at 14:57, Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > I want to add arbitrary-precision floats to Guile. > > I'd use the mpf_t type from GNU MP. > > > One complication is that we'd have to implement the transcendental > > functions. However, I already have code to do tha

More detailed examples of ffi

Greetings Guilers! The other day, aidalgol and I were chatting on irc about the new ffi. The question came up about how to define and access nested structures. I couldn't tell from reading the manual if it can be done. Could some more complex examples be put in the manual that more fully expo

Error in make check building guile-lib for guile 2.0. trap-enable unbound

Howdy Guilers, As some of you know, I've been slowing bringing scwm back up to speed. I've gotten quite far but the next major hurdle is gtk+, so I am attempting to build and install that. The first thing needed is guile-lib, which builds fine for me from git but has the following error outpu

Re: Error in make check building guile-lib for guile 2.0. trap-enable unbound

Neil Jerram wrote: > writes: > > > Howdy Guilers, > > > > As some of you know, I've been slowing bringing scwm back up to speed. > > I've gotten quite far but the next major hurdle is gtk+, so I am > > attempting to build and install that. The first thing needed is > > guile-lib, which bu

Re: proposal: enhance and rename guile-tools

Barry Fishman wrote: > Andy Wingo writes: > > > On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn’t be to > >> everyone’s taste. I’d also be happy with a shorter name, though. > > > > OK. Anyone have any

Re: Hi! Interested in GSoC. Feedback on these ideas?

Paul Raccuglia wrote: > Okay. So I'm settling on the idea of the package manager (not sure > what to call it. A CPAN style thingy.) Oh, that's the easy part. ;^) How about "gear". Could be something like Guile Extension Archive Repository. Gears are finely machined components that mes

Re: Difference letrec & environment binding

Hans Aberg wrote: > What is the practical difference between the two ways of doing the same thing > (letrec or an environment). Is letrec more efficient in the implementation of > Guile? > > Hans > > > (letrec ( > (even? (lambda (n) > (if (zero? n) #t (odd? (- n 1) > (odd?

scm_internal_stack_catch

Howdy Guilers, I've been slowly (very slowly!) debitrotting scwm. The C code is pretty much there, as is most of the Scheme code, except for gtk+ interfaces. There is currently a deprecation warning for scm_internal_stack_catch. The warning says to talk to guile-devel. So I'm talking. ;^)

possible hash deadlock with recent changes

Recent changes to stable-2.0 seem to cause a deadlock in scwm. Here is the last 10 frames of a backtrace. -Dale (gdb) bt #0 0xb77fa424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb734cf02 in __lll_lock_wait () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i686/../i486/lowlevellock.S:142 #2 0xb734839b in _L_l

Re: possible hash deadlock with recent changes

"Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hi, > > writes: > > > Recent changes to stable-2.0 seem to cause a deadlock in scwm. Here is the > > last 10 frames of a backtrace. > > I’m not sure if this is related but there’s this new error that has > started happening from time to time: > [ removed ]

Re: pull and recompile for speed

Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi, > > The VM and compiler got a little help this weekend. Pull and recompile > your .go files and things should be faster. Sounds great! I'm getting a build failure however. :( $ git describe v2.0.1-53-g5eb75b5 Making all in module make[2]: Entering directory `/

Re: pull and recompile for speed

dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote: > > Andy Wingo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The VM and compiler got a little help this weekend. Pull and recompile > > your .go files and things should be faster. > > Sounds great! I'm getting a build failure however. :( > > $ git describe > v2.0.1-53-g5eb7

Re: possible hash deadlock with recent changes

dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote: > > "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > > Hi, > > > > writes: > > > > > Recent changes to stable-2.0 seem to cause a deadlock in scwm. Here is > > > the last 10 frames of a backtrace. > > > > I’m not sure if this is related but there’s this new error that ha

Re: possible hash deadlock with recent changes

Andy Wingo wrote: > On Sat 07 May 2011 16:58, writes: > > > Recent changes to stable-2.0 seem to cause a deadlock in scwm. Here > > is the last 10 frames of a backtrace. > > Fixed. Apologies for the long delay. np! Great Thankfulness is applied. -Dale

Re: guildhall status

Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to bootstrap the guildhall stuff, so last week I started poking > at Andreas' excellent dorodango (http://www.nongnu.org/dorodango/). I > forked his repo on gitorious, removed a bunch of compat stuff for other > implementations, imported dependencies in

Re: guildhall status

dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote: > The test passes with the included git diff. Seems request-host returns a > pair instead of a string, so just use the car. > Bah. Looks like I hozed attaching it. Another try. -Dale diff --git a/test-suite/tests/web-request.test b/test-suite/tests/web-r

Re: The wonders of partial evaluation

"Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hello! > > Three days ago I had the chance to attend William Cook’s excellent > tutorial on partial evaluation at DSL 2011, called “Build your own > partial evaluator in 90 minutes” [0]. > > A few times 90 minutes later, I am pleased to announce a new partial >

Re: And another deprecation joke

David Kastrup wrote: > Andy Wingo writes: > > > On Thu 08 Dec 2011 21:32, David Kastrup writes: > > > >>> So please keep up your (useful!) bug reports, but try to give them a > >>> more positive flavor :) > >> > >> Could you give an example how to deliver with a positive flavor a report

Re: Holidays vs. release

"Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hello Guilers! > > I initially thought it would be great to push a 2.0.4 tarball by the end > of the year, but since I’ll be on holidays starting from tomorrow until > Jan. 3rd, I won’t be able to make it. Sorry about that! I'm still getting that one failure in

Re: Holidays vs. release

dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote: > > "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > > Hello Guilers! > > > > I initially thought it would be great to push a 2.0.4 tarball by the end > > of the year, but since I’ll be on holidays starting from tomorrow until > > Jan. 3rd, I won’t be able to make it. Sorry

Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a

Mark H Weaver wrote: > There's another option: we could properly track the compile-time > dependencies of each module, and automatically consider a .go file stale > if _any_ of its compile-time dependencies are newer than it. > > To be more specific: I think we need to record, in every syn

Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?

Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > () Noah Lavine > () Tue, 1 May 2012 17:15:28 -0400 > >And if not, would we like one? > > It would be great to have one. Yeah, there is one: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/branch_release-1-8 I suspect that Andy mer

Re: Performance tracking

Noah Lavine wrote: > It appears to me (anecdotally) that most of the build time is spent > compiling Scheme code, rather than C code. > > One idea I had been toying with is whether Guile could compile faster > if it had another copy of Guile already around, so it could skip the > portion o

Re: Performance tracking

"Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hi! > > skribis: > > > Noah Lavine wrote: > >> It appears to me (anecdotally) that most of the build time is spent > >> compiling Scheme code, rather than C code. > >> > >> One idea I had been toying with is whether Guile could compile faster > >> if it

Re: Switching to Git?

Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > How about switching from CVS to Git [0]? > As an aside, in GStreamer we are going to completely punt on this > question, and switch to subversion. You get changesets, which allows > git-svn, bzr-svn, et

Re: "guile-config link" reports LDFLAGS it has been compiled with

"Ludovic Courtès" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It would be nice to see a pkg-config file for guile; I kind of remember > > this floating around on the list but 1.8.3 doesn't seem to install it. > > Yes, there are several (!) patches for this, so th

Re: guile-vm hacking

Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The following changes since commit b89fc2153ec8a46ce55d16c3a90a559117bc3aa1: > Start the process of de-dottification. > procedures-with-setters, debitrot `optimize', dedottification > Dedottify some more > more dedott

Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE

"Ludovic Courtès" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > After switching from the 1.8 branch to master, I get > > > > ./autogen.sh: line 22: gnulib-tool: command not found > > > > > > I'm on Fedora 9. Where do I get gnulib-tool ? > > With "g

Re: RFD: please drop ChangeLog updates

Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reasons: > > * Much more detailed and inherently correct information can be gotten from > > git log -- libguile/ > > git log -- test-suite/ > > etc. > > * The ChangeLog duplicates the git log information if done correctly. Hence > it

guile-vm .go files in GUILE_LOAD_PATH

I've been tracking the guile-vm branch lately and had a recent problem. After much head scratching we finally figured out that a previously installed .go file was being used during the buld. We (Andy and I on irc) hacked around it by creating a new environment variable that pre-inst-guile-env

Re: guile-vm .go files in GUILE_LOAD_PATH

Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu 18 Sep 2008 00:57, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Basically, a .go file will be preferred over a .scm file even if the > > .scm file is earlier in the load-path. I think that the file earlier > > in the load-path should win. > > A f

Re: full moon, vm status update

Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It seems fork + signal handling is borked with a guile compiled --with-threads >-- and that's not >specific to the vm branch. And this is the very reason that Debian guile was built --without-threads. It's just not a good idea to mix fork() with pthre

Re: Killing off scm_init_guile for Guile 2.0 ?

Neil Jerram wrote: > scm_init_guile has always been a bit problematic, as it requires lots > of heuristic and OS-dependent code to try to determine where the base > of the stack is. It's never been formally deprecated, but we have > always advised people to use scm_boot_guile or scm_with_gu

Re: new dependency?

Neil Jerram wrote: > Greg Troxel writes: > > > my autobuild choked with: > > > > configure: error: GNU libunistring is required, please install it. > > > > and I don't recall seeing any discussion about this. > > Hi Greg, > > It was mentioned here: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lis

Re: autocompilation support in master

Mark H Weaver wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:24:48AM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: > > > GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ../meta/uninstalled-env guile-tools compile -o > > > "language/ecmascript/spec.go" "language/ecmascript/spec.scm" > > > ERROR: Stack overflow > > > > This is still happening for

RE: [PATCH 1/1] fport_print: handle ttyname ENODEV

From: "Maxime Devos" > I’ve seen do { body; } while (0) in some places (albeit not in SCM_SYSCALL), which you might want investigate and maybe copy (instead of the { body; }), but I don’t know what the purpose of that construct is.It's a way of turning a block into a statement. So you can