---- Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> wrote: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > Also, there are definite benefits to using a conservative GC for > > libguile, given how tightly it can be integrated with C (e.g., [2]). > > > My main concern is/was that by moving to a conservatice GC, and > _consequently changing the API of libguile to assume a conservative GC_ > (as outlined in [2]), you get third code relying on that as well. This > would make it effectively impossible to ever switch back to a precise GC > without potentially breaking all third-party code using the libguile > API.
Isn't the current gc in guile already conservative? -Dale
