Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-04-15 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
e to globally disable logging to files. I would like some recommendations how to do this better! If the community likes this implementation, I would be happy to apply/rebase my changes onto the official repo, and then we can go from there! Best regards, Daniel Dinnyes

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-05-21 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
ork as in ice-9. - improved interact macro, to allow specifying separate expect/input and interact/output ports. The code can be found here <https://github.com/dadinn/common/blob/feature/expect4/expect.scm>. Thanks, Daniel On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 at 16:10, Daniel Dinnyes wrote: > H

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-05-23 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
-9 readline) are then sent to this port instead. Cheers, Daniel On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 23:26, Daniel Dinnyes wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It seems this hasn't garnered much attention. > > Nevertheless, meanwhile I've realised the code had a few bugs, in > par

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-05-28 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
Thanks for the reply. On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 14:39, Maxime Devos wrote: > I think this would gather more replies if: > > 1. It is sent as a patch that can be applied to the Guile source tree. > (You wrote: > > > If the community likes this implementation, I would be happy to > > apply/rebas

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-06-11 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
xpect-tests for some comprehensive tests. Wasn't sure where to place it, and how to integrate into the existing test-suite. Not sure how to send a PR by email, but I suppose it should be easy to pull, by adding my fork as an additional remote. Best regards, Daniel Dinnyes On Mon, 29 May 20

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-06-18 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
m/dadinn/guile/tree/wip-hygienic-expect>... but I've force pushed it! ;) Best regards, Daniel Dinnyes On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 at 16:48, Daniel Dinnyes wrote: > I've rebased my changes onto a fork of Guile's main branch on Github: > https://github.com/dadinn/guile/tree/

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-09-23 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
my response to your points in red below: On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 12:57, Maxime Devos wrote: > > > Op 19-06-2023 om 01:37 schreef Daniel Dinnyes: > > I have to apologise for the massive hatched-job I did with that > "rebase"! :P > > Some references to my own mod

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-10-26 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
e the tests close all ports correctly. Not sure where the issue could be coming from. At any rate, I have used the interact macro extensively outside of the tests, and never had such problems with it. Best regards, Daniel Dinnyes On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 21:22, Maxime Devos wrote: > Hi, &

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-11-18 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
I think a git pull should work, or alternatively a rebase would be unlikely to cause conflicts either. Could you please clarify? Best regards, Daniel Dinnyes On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 17:58, Maxime Devos wrote: > > > Op 27-10-2023 om 03:03 schreef Daniel Dinnyes: > > Regarding, that

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-11-19 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
Sure. Apologies for my confusion / misunderstanding. On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 23:47, Maxime Devos wrote: > > > Op 18-11-2023 om 12:29 schreef Daniel Dinnyes: > > Hi Maxime, > > > > I am still not sure I understand what you meant. > > You've said you weren&#x

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2024-02-23 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
Hi everyone, I am curious if anyone has interest in discussing this any further. Best regards, Daniel Dinnyes On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 23:49, Daniel Dinnyes wrote: > Sure. Apologies for my confusion / misunderstanding. > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 23:47, Maxime Devos wrote: > >&