On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 09:43 +0100, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> IMO, we don't have to write assembler again, since GNU Binutils does.
> The only necessary work is to map bytecode->asm, and add a AOT option
> with a script into 'guild' for calling Binutils.
>
>
> This is my approach: translate
Hi,
Nala Ginrut skribis:
> Sorry, but this implementation seems to be a tail-recursive unsafe one.
I’ve seen the bug report and will look at it as time permits, unless
someone else beats me at it. ;-)
Ludo’.
I believe this delayed for a 6+ months. And I'm glad to see it's
implemented with delimited-continuation.
0001-Move-let-ec-to-top-level.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
To note is that in order to implement common lisp one need to bypass tree-il
and generate directly to glil, the reason is that tagbody is poorly
represented
by tree-il. If we intend to be multilingual it would be nice to be able to
effectively
represent those ideoms. Any thoughts on it?
/Stef
Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> To note is that in order to implement common lisp one need to bypass tree-il
> and generate directly to glil, the reason is that tagbody is poorly
> represented
> by tree-il. If we intend to be multilingual it would be nice to be able to
> effectively
> represent
>> The reason is accessing macros from languages
>> other than C is cumbersome.
>
> Apologies for ignoring you.
Hi, Wingo, Hi, All,
No need to apologise, given your track record I trust you spending
every minute of your time for a good purpose. :)
Lack of time is a good evolutionary filter agains
