Hi Mike,
Mike Gran writes:
>> > Also, the netbsd build will likely fail because there is new
>> > 'condition is always true' condition in array-handle.c:103
>> >
>> > 100 SCM
>> > 101 scm_array_handle_element_type (scm_t_array_handle *h)
>> > 102 {
>> > 103
>> if (h->element_type < 0 || h->el
On Sat 15 Aug 2009 19:53, Barry Fishman writes:
> Although guile-lib git master works with Guile 1.9.1, there seems to be
> a problem with Guile 1.9.2.
>
> Seen from: Ubuntu Jaunty x86_64
>
> $ guile
> Guile Scheme interpreter 0.5 on Guile 1.9.2
> Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Free Software Foundation,
Hi Juhani,
On Sat 15 Aug 2009 13:54, Juhani Viheräkoski writes:
> [simplex] now seems to run forever when compiled but works with the
> interpreter. It used to work when I last tried, that was maybe a week
> ago.
This was fixed in 7f7b85cbf68a8b83e1ad7bc78379cf2764fc9a1b. Thanks for
the report!
Hi Ken,
On Tue 11 Aug 2009 15:59, Ken Raeburn writes:
> Perhaps I'm building [Guile] in ways that are unusual for the other
> developers (build dir != src dir, libgmp and guile-1.8 installed in
> the same place, libgmp and libunistring installed in different
> nonstandard directories)?
I think
Hi Mike,
On Sun 13 Sep 2009 16:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mike Gran writes:
>
>> With the default behavior of 1.9.x, REPL debug and backtrace are broken.
>
> Indeed, it looks like the VM frames are ignored.
Hopefully by the next release, and certainly by the following one, thi
On Wed 16 Sep 2009 02:20, Mike Gran writes:
> [Insert standard rant about using -Werror here.]
We should not be making releases with -Werror.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Tue 08 Sep 2009 15:17, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> We should implement constant folding in the tree-il->glil pass. A naive
> implementation looks like this:
>
> diff --git a/module/language/tree-il/compile-glil.scm
> b/module/language/tree-il/compile-glil.scm
> index 86b610f..57a
On Tue 01 Sep 2009 08:26, Ken Raeburn writes:
> On Sep 1, 2009, at 02:23, Ken Raeburn wrote:
>> I can clean some of this up trivially -- SCM_PACK/SCM_UNPACK as
>> needed, change == to scm_is_eq. The initializers make it slightly
>> less trivial, and I can imagine different courses of action.
>
>
On Sun 13 Sep 2009 23:17, Neil Jerram writes:
> I think that's the right eventual question, anyway. The context is
> running Alan Grover's mod_lisp-for-guile in 1.9.2.
>
> The mod_lisp-for-guile code includes a use of read-hash-extend to
> define a syntax for a compiled regular expression - so t
Hi,
On Wed 16 Sep 2009 11:09, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> > 100 SCM
>>> > 101 scm_array_handle_element_type (scm_t_array_handle *h)
>>> > 102 {
>>> > 103
>>> if (h->element_type < 0 || h->element_type > SCM_ARRAY_ELEMENT_TYPE_LAST)
>>> > 104 abort (); /* guile programming er
Hi,
Andy Wingo writes:
> What is a #y vector? Does anyone know?
No idea. Where does it come from?
Ludo’.
> What is a #y vector? Does anyone know?
From the 1.3.2 changelog
1998-10-18 Mikael Djurfeldt
* unif.c (scm_raprin1): Changed print syntax for byte vectors from
#bytes(...) to #y(...), and syntax for short vectors from
#short(...) to #h(...). This may seem nutty, but, like th
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> What is a #y vector? Does anyone know?
>
> No idea. Where does it come from?
>
> Ludo’.
>From the error message it is a generalized vector, which no longer
exists. What seems to be wanted is a bitvector. There does not
s
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sun 13 Sep 2009 16:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Mike Gran writes:
>>
>>> With the default behavior of 1.9.x, REPL debug and backtrace are broken.
>>
>> Indeed, it looks like the VM frames are ignored.
>
> Hopefully by the next release, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
