On Tue 01 Sep 2009 08:26, Ken Raeburn <raeb...@raeburn.org> writes: > On Sep 1, 2009, at 02:23, Ken Raeburn wrote: >> I can clean some of this up trivially -- SCM_PACK/SCM_UNPACK as >> needed, change == to scm_is_eq. The initializers make it slightly >> less trivial, and I can imagine different courses of action. > > Okay, not quite so trivial as I blithely asserted. > > It looks like the eval code is going to be annoying too
All this will be gone within a month, hopefully. Further details to come. I don't see it as such a big problem to play "fast and loose" with types, honestly... one day we'll have native compilation, and it's all just words there. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
