Re: entering and leaving guile mode, and GC stack protection

Hello, Andy Wingo writes: > On Thu 06 Aug 2009 18:30, Ken Raeburn writes: > >> On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:06, I wrote: >>> (3) My four-year-old comments on scm_enter/leave_guile, recorded in >>> threads.c around line 300, still stand Those functions really >>> ought to go away. At least they'r

Re: Porting GNU Projects - Guile

Neil Jerram wrote: > > bornlibra23 writes: > >> Thanks Mike for the heads up but the problem I think is with the source >> code >> itself. I get the same error on linux though it doesnt die there. I >> preprocessed the code & changed the line like so : >>>From (ch) == ' ' | (ch) == '\t') t

Re: Removing memoizers from the 1.8 public API?

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello! > > I'm tempted to apply these two patches to 1.8: > > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=4d0949ea45c46dd13e767a8a3342d02caef1b483 > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=b3ce13b667634be30ab2d74b8ccb1de190

Re: Using a linker version script

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > It also makes it possible to provide two versions of the same symbol, > e.g.: > > SCM scm_from_string (const char *)--> GUILE_2.0 > SCM scm_from_string (const char *, scm_t_handler) --> GUILE_2.1 > > Applications that were compiled again

Re: Removing memoizers from the 1.8 public API?

Hi Neil, Neil Jerram writes: > If the temptation is strong, though, I'd add that > > - 4d0949 looks safe. It's arguably just a bug that these functions > were ever exposed, and I don't think that anyone will actually have > found them useful outside libguile. Agreed. I'll eventually commi

Re: Using a linker version script

Neil Jerram writes: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> It also makes it possible to provide two versions of the same symbol, >> e.g.: >> >> SCM scm_from_string (const char *)--> GUILE_2.0 >> SCM scm_from_string (const char *, scm_t_handler) --> GUILE_2.1 >> >> Appli

Re: Problems with and libguile/__scm.h on HP-UX/IA64

Neil Jerram writes: > Albert Chin writes: >> But, on HP-UX/IA64, has a conflicting declaration of jmp_buf. > > Thanks for the report. This is also a Debian bug [1], and their patch > is [2]. > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506684 > [2] > http://patch-tracking.debian.

Re: trace examples broken in master

Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 14 Jul 2009 10:07, Neil Jerram writes: > >> but the right thing to do is to fix the scm_set_source_properties_x () >> code. > > Yes, this would be better. Here are my proposed changes for that, for master. Please let me know of any comments. Unfortunately too late

Review request for wip-manual branch

The wip-manual branch contains various bits of work on the manual. It's largely driven by the plan to publish the manual as a book, later this year, and the biggest change so far is the merging of the GOOPS manual. Apart from that I'm not following any kind of systematic plan, just reviewing and w

Re: trace examples broken in master

Hey Neil, Thanks for addressing this. Looking forward to trying it out -- it'll be a great help. Regards, Julian On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> On Tue 14 Jul 2009 10:07, Neil Jerram writes: >> >>> but the right thing to do is to fix the scm_set

Re: Problems with and libguile/__scm.h on HP-UX/IA64

Neil Jerram writes: > Neil Jerram writes: > >> Albert Chin writes: > >>> But, on HP-UX/IA64, has a conflicting declaration of jmp_buf. >> >> Thanks for the report. This is also a Debian bug [1], and their patch >> is [2]. >> >> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506684 >> [2

guile.m4

Hi- guile.m4's serial number should be bumped for releases if it has changed. Thanks, Mike

Re: Using a linker version script

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > It will give us more options on GNU (and possibly Solaris) but not on > the other platforms. So that won't affect our policy of not breaking > the ABI during a stable series. > > On GNU and Solaris, we may be able to reduce the number of applications > tha

Re: Problems with and libguile/__scm.h on HP-UX/IA64

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Looks good to me (you can still commit it for 1.9.2 if you want). Thanks, but I think it's OK to wait. Even if we lose out on some testing, and eventually release 2.0 with a bug, it's still only a bug fix needed that we can add later. Neil

Re: Porting GNU Projects - Guile

bornlibra23 writes: > I just patched this in the code butu it still fails. I have yet to try the > 1.8.7 version. In the same way, or differently? Please provide the relevant part of the new build output. Regards, Neil