Hi Neil, Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> If the temptation is strong, though, I'd add that > > - 4d0949 looks safe. It's arguably just a bug that these functions > were ever exposed, and I don't think that anyone will actually have > found them useful outside libguile. Agreed. I'll eventually commit this one if nobody objects. > - b3ce13 looks like a non-starter to me. By putting those function in > SCM_ENABLE_DEPRECATED we've explicitly acknowledged IMO that there > are possible reasonable uses for them; so removing them in the > middle of a stable series would be very odd. Agreed, too (that was the reason for making it a separate patch). Nevertheless, I think the rationale for having the non-deprecated memoizers private holds as well for the deprecated memoizers. Thanks, Ludo'.
