Hi. I know there has been a lot of talk about wide characters and
Unicode over the years. I'd like to see it happen because how the are
implemented will determine the future of a couple of my side-projects.
I could pitch in, if you needed some help.
I looked over the history of guile-devel, and
Hello!
Mike Gran writes:
> Hi. I know there has been a lot of talk about wide characters and
> Unicode over the years. I'd like to see it happen because how the are
> implemented will determine the future of a couple of my side-projects.
> I could pitch in, if you needed some help.
Indeed, it
2009/1/25 Ludovic Courtès :
>
> I agree it would be really nice to have Unicode support, but I'm not
> aware of any "plan", so please go ahead! :-)
Indeed.
> A few considerations regarding the inevitable debate about the internal
> string representation:
[...]
But what about the other possible
> From: Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org
I believe that we should aim for R6RS strings.
I think the most important thing is to have humility in the face of an
impossible problem: how to encode all textual information. It is
important to "stand on the shoulders of giants" here. It becomes a
matter o
Hi everyone,
(Switching this conversation to guile-devel from guile-user, since it
seems more appropriate to this list...)
Alright, so I've been studying the van Tonder and Dybvig-Ghuloum
implementations and banging my head against chapter 7 of R6RS, all
with an eye towards mapping them onto Guil
