FYI, the Debian Lenny release will include Guile 1.8.5. Thanks
especially to Rob for making this happen, but also to many others who
helped with bug reporting, fixing and advice.
Neil
-- Forwarded message --
From: Debian testing watch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/8/31
2008/9/1 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On a tangent, is anyone still seriously considering to run Emacs atop GUILE?
Running a whole Emacs on top of Guile? - no.
Running some Emacs Lisp code on top of Guile? - yes.
But I admit that what I have in mind is still vaporware right now. So
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - return scm_c_memq (x, lst);
> + for (; !SCM_NULL_OR_NIL_P (lst); lst = SCM_CDR (lst))
> +{
> + SCM_VALIDATE_CONS (2, lst);
>
> Looks cleaner to use SCM_CONS_P (or whatever it is called) as loop guard,
> so it is obviously correct, an
2008/9/1 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> This is a followup to this discussion:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7194
>
> The attached patch changes several list-related functions
reverse!, memq, memv, member, filter, filter!
SRFI-1: concatenate, concatenate!,
Hi Neil,
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> so that they
>> don't validate their input with `SCM_VALIDATE_LIST ()' since it's O(n).
>
> I'm afraid I don't get your rationale, because all these functions are
> O(n) anyway.
You're right, but it's always better to traverse the list once r
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> On a tangent, is anyone still seriously considering to run Emacs atop GUILE?
>
> There's Ken Reaburn's attempt at http://www.mit.edu/~raeburn/guilemacs/ ,
> and there's also the Elisp support that's under `lang'. I don't think
> the former is really maintained. The l
Neil Jerram escreveu:
> 2008/9/1 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a followup to this discussion:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7194
>>
>> The attached patch changes several list-related functions
>
> reverse!, memq, memv, member, filter, filter!
