Ludovic Courtès escreveu: >> On a tangent, is anyone still seriously considering to run Emacs atop GUILE? > > There's Ken Reaburn's attempt at http://www.mit.edu/~raeburn/guilemacs/ , > and there's also the Elisp support that's under `lang'. I don't think > the former is really maintained. The latter isn't actively maintained > either but I think it's in a pretty good shape. Neil?
What is the intended use case of running Elisp in GUILE ? Is anyone using it for anything? >> -;;;; Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> +;;;; Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2006, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> >> Can we do this in one fell swoop, adding 2008 to all files? > > I wouldn't do that. I think updating the copyright year *when* a change > is made is better: it allows people to see at a glance whether a file > has been changed at all recently I think that git log FILE is the reliable and precise way to check that. The headers are so much boilerplate that I pretty much ignore all of them. > and avoids pointless commits. We could add 2008 to all files in a single commit, and avoid poluting diffs with header blah blah for an entire year. > However, the GNU maintainer's guide (see (info "(maintain) Copyright > Notices")) prefers the other way: > > To update the list of year numbers, add each year in which you have > made nontrivial changes to the package. (Here we assume you're using a > publicly accessible revision control server, so that every revision > installed is also immediately and automatically published.) When you > add the new year, it is not required to keep track of which files have > seen significant changes in the new year and which have not. It is > recommended and simpler to add the new year to all files in the > package, and be done with it for the rest of the year. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
