Hi,
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 01:31 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Speaking of which, a -g compile on PPC uses quite a lot of stack -- I
> > had to up the default limit in order to get anything to work (for
> > example, compiling psyntax). That would be an
"Martin Kuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And if it works smoothly, a module browser could be implemented on top of it.
> And the way to extend the load-path could be generalized to
> inspect/adapt guile's runtime options.
Yes, those would both be nice features too.
> With "timeout for help-e
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Is it just the compilers that changed,
Seems to be, it's still fine with for instance gcc 2.95 unoptimized.
gcc 4 seems to use up a lot more stack in CEVAL()/DEVAL() when
unoptimized, something like 900 bytes for me, but why that's so I
couldn't tell. (
