Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is it just the compilers that changed,
Seems to be, it's still fine with for instance gcc 2.95 unoptimized. gcc 4 seems to use up a lot more stack in CEVAL()/DEVAL() when unoptimized, something like 900 bytes for me, but why that's so I couldn't tell. (Keeping stack usage in that func to a minimum would probably be a good thing in general though, as the main recursion when interpreting ...) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
