Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now in CVS:
Ok, cool.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And to get this marginal benefit we have to add a module option and
> some code which will slow down normal operation. Not noticeably
> perhaps, but it all adds up.
Following your concern (I mean the performance concern, not the
"marginal benefit" c
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Thanks. In this case, I'm pretty sure my bug fixes don't qualify as
>> NEWS.
>
> What is the continuations versus stack bit you added some tests for?
> Is it a fix for something?
Yes, for `(call/cc make-stack)
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, for `(call/cc make-stack)'. make-stack is supposed to be able to
> construct a stack from a continuation, a debug object, or from `#t',
> which means the current evaluation stack. But the make-stack code was
> missing a lot of the relocations that a
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not as far as I'm concerned, though would a trivial NEWS entry be
> appropriate? i.e. perhaps something like
>
> ** make-stack can now correctly construct a stack from a continuation.
>
> if that's correct.
Yes, that would be fine.
Neil
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Following your concern (I mean the performance concern, not the
> "marginal benefit" concern), I thought of another way to achieve the
> same thing, a bit more generic and slightly better performance-wise
> (patch attached). [...]
Thanks for taking my
"Pach Roman (GS-EC/ESA4) *" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm just testing the 1.7.2-3 version under cygwin.
> Here is what I've found.
>
> guile> 11/3
> 11/3
This is a feature, exact fractions are new in 1.7.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel
