[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Following your concern (I mean the performance concern, not the
> "marginal benefit" concern), I thought of another way to achieve the
> same thing, a bit more generic and slightly better performance-wise
> (patch attached). [...]
Thanks for taking my considerations into account and producing this
update. My gut feel is that I do like this new patch better, but I'd
like to think about it more. I also need to go back and finish my
draft reply to your previous email - I'll try to do that in the next
day or so.
Also, do you have docs for guile-reader up somewhere?
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
