[PATCH] Test-suite update

2005-09-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
[Switched to `guile-devel'.] Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You'll need to make something for > test-suite/tests/socket.test exercising each case, eventually. It turns out that I had never looked at the test-suite, mostly because it isn't run at `make check' time. Additionally, the `g

Re: [PATCH] Test-suite update

2005-09-22 Thread Neil Jerram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > The patch below fixes these two things. It also comments out the > `elisp' test which results in a stack overflow here. My understanding > is that the Elisp work is almost only due to Neil has never been widely > used, so hopefully it won't hurt too

Re: [PATCH] Test-suite update

2005-09-22 Thread Neil Jerram
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> The patch below fixes these two things. It also comments out the >> `elisp' test which results in a stack overflow here. My understanding >> is that the Elisp work is almost only due to Neil has never been

Re: [PATCH] Test-suite update

2005-09-22 Thread Kevin Ryde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > It turns out that I had never looked at the test-suite, mostly because > it isn't run at `make check' time. It is, but from the top-level ./check-guile. > Additionally, the `guile-test' script was largely outdated. Maybe could be removed if no long

Re: [PATCH] Test-suite update

2005-09-22 Thread Kevin Ryde
I wrote: > > It is, but from the top-level ./check-guile. I mean the test-suite is run from make check, but via the top-level Makefile.am, not the Makefile.am in the test-suite directory. ___ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gn