[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > The patch below fixes these two things. It also comments out the > `elisp' test which results in a stack overflow here. My understanding > is that the Elisp work is almost only due to Neil has never been widely > used, so hopefully it won't hurt too much until a better solution is > found.
That's correct. I'll see if I can debug this, though, so that the test can then be reinstated. Thanks for pointing it out. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel