[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> The patch below fixes these two things.  It also comments out the
> `elisp' test which results in a stack overflow here.  My understanding
> is that the Elisp work is almost only due to Neil has never been widely
> used, so hopefully it won't hurt too much until a better solution is
> found.

That's correct.  I'll see if I can debug this, though, so that the
test can then be reinstated.  Thanks for pointing it out.

     Neil



_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel

Reply via email to