Hi,
I'm just now getting around to taking care of this oldie.
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 18:06 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (See
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2006-06/msg00013.html
> > if you didn't see the whole description on gu
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Guile wants you to integrate your objects with its mark/sweep
>>> approach, by providing appropriate smob marking functions, for
>>> example.
>>
>> If I've understood correctly, this isn't possible in Gregor
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Guile wants you to integrate your objects with its mark/sweep
>> approach, by providing appropriate smob marking functions, for
>> example.
>
> If I've understood correctly, this isn't possible in Gregory's
> scenario.
>
> (See
> http://lists.gnu.org/arch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>If I've understood correctly, this isn't possible in Gregory's
>>scenario.
>>
>>(See
>>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2006-06/msg00013.html
>>if you didn'
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I've understood correctly, this isn't possible in Gregory's
>scenario.
>
>(See
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2006-06/msg00013.html
>if you didn't see the whole description on guile-gtk-general already
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
>
>> No, MV thinks it's a bad idea, and I agree with him.
>>
>> See
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/4117/focus=4160
>
> Yep, and let me elaborate a bit:
>
> The pair scm_gc_protect_ob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>[...]
>>It seems to me, though, that the same kind of situation, leading to
>>wanting to call scm_gc_unprotect_object during GC, is likely to arise
>>in any sufficiently com
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> guile-gnome (up to v. 2.7.98, most recent as of this writing) can
>> call scm_gc_unprotect_object() during a scheme garbage collector
>> sweep, which is a fatal error in guile-1.8. In earlier versions
>> of guile, it is not
[added crosspost to guile-devel]
"gregory benison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> guile-gnome (up to v. 2.7.98, most recent as of this writing) can
> call scm_gc_unprotect_object() during a scheme garbage collector
> sweep, which is a fatal error in guile-1.8. In earlier versions
> of guile, it i
