In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If I've understood correctly, this isn't possible in Gregory's >scenario. > >(See >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2006-06/msg00013.html >if you didn't see the whole description on guile-gtk-general already.)
I don't understand. The way I read it, Gregory concludes his email with a solution for his problem. In any event, it's easy to write your own GC protection scheme, which can have different semantics. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
