On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 09:43 +0100, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> IMO, we don't have to write assembler again, since GNU Binutils does.
> The only necessary work is to map bytecode->asm, and add a AOT option
> with a script into 'guild' for calling Binutils.
>
>
> This is my approach: translate
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 22:59 +0200, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The byte-code -> native-code compiler is does serve my needs pretty well
> now. It should really
> soon be possible to add code that will auto compile bytecode versions to
> native versions. The compiler is not perfect and
Hi,
The byte-code -> native-code compiler is does serve my needs pretty well
now. It should really
soon be possible to add code that will auto compile bytecode versions to
native versions. The compiler is not perfect and some instructions is
missing. But it can go from VM->NATIVE->VM and so on so
Hi,
Branching now works and a big enough subset of the VM is translatable for
some interesting
benchmarks to be done.
So by skipping the goto structure a the win is maybe 3-4x for simple
numerical loops. I do expect
these loop ta be another factor of 2 when the wip-rtl is translated in the
same w
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Mon 02 Jul 2012 09:53, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
> writes:
>
> > Anyway I can now compile simple functions to native sequences of machine
> code but with some
> > tools around it so let me explain the setup.
>
> Where is this code? Sorry for
On Mon 02 Jul 2012 09:53, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> Anyway I can now compile simple functions to native sequences of machine code
> but with some
> tools around it so let me explain the setup.
Where is this code? Sorry for not following the context.
I agree with you that maintenance
