Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Is it just the compilers that changed,
Seems to be, it's still fine with for instance gcc 2.95 unoptimized.
gcc 4 seems to use up a lot more stack in CEVAL()/DEVAL() when
unoptimized, something like 900 bytes for me, but why that's so I
couldn't tell. (
piling psyntax). That would be another issue though...
>
> Yeah, it's a "known issue" also on x86. The default stack limit is a
> bit tight for a "-O0" build. I guess we should just double it or
> something. Or should we make the default 'unlimited'?
issue" also on x86. The default stack limit is a
bit tight for a "-O0" build. I guess we should just double it or
something. Or should we make the default 'unlimited'?
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
