On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 09:42:49PM +0100, Maxime Devos wrote:
[...]
> (I assume 'snarfing' is a form of copying here.)
Basically yes. Something like "stealing", perhaps because the source
isn't aware of the fact that it has got a new use.
The term is old UNIX tradition [1]. From there, it proba
Hi Maxime,
Maxime Devos writes:
> Op 18-11-2023 om 05:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer:
>> * SRFI-61:: A more general `cond' clause
>> * SRFI-62:: S-expression comments.
>> -* SRFI-64:: A Scheme API for test suites.
>> +* SRFI 64::
+@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification
+@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script.
That HTML document comes with a license that requires:
> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> included in all copies or substantial portions of the
Op 18-11-2023 om 05:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer:
* SRFI-61:: A more general `cond' clause
* SRFI-62:: S-expression comments.
-* SRFI-64:: A Scheme API for test suites.
+* SRFI 64:: A Scheme API for test suites.
On 11/18/23 04:42, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
+
+There are other testing frameworks written in Scheme, including
+@url{http://schematics.sourceforge.net/schemeunit.html, SchemeUnit}.
+However SchemeUnit is not portable. It is also a bit on the verbose
+side. It would be useful to have a bridge bet
This is an import of the 'Abstract', 'Rationale', and 'Specification'
sections from the upstream specification text, with some manual
adjustment.
* doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI 64): New subsection.
---
Changes in v2:
- Fix the category of many definitions
doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi | 829 ++
