Hi Maxime, Maxime Devos <maximede...@telenet.be> writes:
> Op 18-11-2023 om 05:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer: >> * SRFI-61:: A more general `cond' clause >> * SRFI-62:: S-expression comments. >> -* SRFI-64:: A Scheme API for test suites. >> +* SRFI 64:: A Scheme API for test suites. >> * SRFI-67:: Compare procedures >> * SRFI-69:: Basic hash tables. >> * SRFI-71:: Extended let-syntax for multiple values. > > That seems rather inconsistent. It is in Guile (for now), but upstream nobody appears to calls "SRFI 64" as "SRFI-64", so unless we are constrained to use a hyphen, it seems more correct to leave it. If it makes sense, I could send a patch automating the simple substitution to standardize on no hyphen for all of our SRFIs nodes / section names. >> +@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification >> +@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script. > > That HTML document comes with a license that requires: > >> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be >> included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > yet I'm not seeing those notices in the texi. I've added a copyright notice to srfi-modules.texi and the Expat license text to @copying in guile.texi, see v3. Thanks for taking a look! -- Maxim
