> On 12 Jan 2023, at 23:27, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> lloda skribis:
>
>>> On 11 Jan 2023, at 18:37, Thompson, David wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which
would combine
lloda skribis:
>> On 11 Jan 2023, at 18:37, Thompson, David wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>>
>>> What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which
>>> would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’.
>>
>> 'bytevector-copy' alr
> On 11 Jan 2023, at 18:37, Thompson, David wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which
>> would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’.
>
> 'bytevector-copy' already exists, or do you