> On 12 Jan 2023, at 23:27, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> lloda <ll...@sarc.name> skribis:
>
>>> On 11 Jan 2023, at 18:37, Thompson, David <dthomps...@worcester.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which
>>>> would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’.
>>>
>>> 'bytevector-copy' already exists, or do you mean some different
>>> implementation of it?
>>>
>>> - Dave
>>
>> The current bytevector-copy takes a single argument.
>
> Right, what I had in mind is one that would take an offset and size; I
> hadn’t realized the name was already taken.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
Actually (scheme base) from r7rs already defines (bytevector-copy bytevector
start end), this is of course r7rs's convention. This is hidden in Guile's
manual, which only lists the 1-argument version from r6rs.
