On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for the feedback, it's really useful.
>
> On Tue 29 Apr 2014 17:56, Doug Evans writes:
>
>> The struct interface, contrary to what the documentation says, takes a
>> stdarg list beginning with the number of fields (and not termi
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
>[...]
>> Portability is more problematic for pointer types. The C standards make
>> no guarantees about the semantics of converting between pointers and
>> integers, and it's not clear to me how future proof this will be.
>
> Don't they make so
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Doug Evans skribis:
>
>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Doug Evans skribis:
>>>
While function declarations are markable as being internal/external in
published headers (SCM_INTERNAL vs SCM_API), macr
Doug Evans skribis:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Doug Evans skribis:
>>
>>> While function declarations are markable as being internal/external in
>>> published headers (SCM_INTERNAL vs SCM_API), macros are not.
>>
>> Internal macros are marked by a naming convent
Hi all, I'm working with two paths right now when it comes to gc.
1. Using finalizers, that fails right now
2. A modded version of bdw-gc found at
https://gitorious.org/bdw-gc-logical-mod
I was thinking of showing how the new API in 2) is working, just for the
curious. So:
GC_new_kind_adv (...,
Hello,
guile-gnome
master: fix unless macro definition for guile prior to guile-2 only
Patch review solicited.
Thanks,
David
>From 910343bf6793d512979af851b504b83b06a10ed2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 16:01:30 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fi
Hello,
guile-gnome
master: fix scm-error incorrect arg ist in gtk.scm
Patch review solicited.
Thanks,
David>From df58a66726803f4698356d721d7611d2d11c9ee7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 15:38:55 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fix scm-error incorr
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Doug Evans skribis:
>
>> While function declarations are markable as being internal/external in
>> published headers (SCM_INTERNAL vs SCM_API), macros are not.
>
> Internal macros are marked by a naming convention: they are prefixed by
> ‘S
Hi.
Is any of the following exported?
[or are they internal implementation details?]
I can certainly imagine it's the latter, but the DATA versions do
solve the problem (*1) of accessing struct fields as raw values.
#define SCM_STRUCT_DATA(X) ((scm_t_bits*)SCM_CELL_WORD_1 (X))
#defi
Doug Evans skribis:
> While function declarations are markable as being internal/external in
> published headers (SCM_INTERNAL vs SCM_API), macros are not.
Internal macros are marked by a naming convention: they are prefixed by
‘SCM_I’.
If this convention is deemed insufficient, we could #ifdef
10 matches
Mail list logo
