Doug Evans <xdj...@gmail.com> skribis: > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Doug Evans <xdj...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> While function declarations are markable as being internal/external in >>> published headers (SCM_INTERNAL vs SCM_API), macros are not. >> >> Internal macros are marked by a naming convention: they are prefixed by >> ‘SCM_I’. > > Hi. Sorry, catching up on mail. > > So this means that struct.h:SCM_STRUCT_* are ok to use by apps, right?
You got me. ;-) These ones are not documented, and some of them are clearly too low-level and expose too many implementation details (flags, indexes, etc.) ‘SCM_STRUCTP’, ‘SCM_STRUCT_SLOT_REF’, and a few others may be OK, but there are equivalent public functions anyway, so it’s better to use them. I’m not sure what to do for this particular header. Ludo’.
