On 2 May 2013 23:27, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote:
> This patch allows uri-encode to uppercase the percent-encoded part. So,
>
> (uri-encode "/")
> => %2f
>
> (uri-encode "/" #:uppercase #t)
> => %2F
Hi
Why make this optional, it seems like unnecessary fluff? Both cases
are equivalent, and RFC
On 3 May 2013 09:00, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 2 May 2013 23:27, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote:
>> This patch allows uri-encode to uppercase the percent-encoded part. So,
>>
>> (uri-encode "/")
>> => %2f
>>
>> (uri-encode "/" #:uppercase #t)
>> => %2F
>
> Hi
>
> Why make this optional, it seems l
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Aleix,
>
> There was one remaining problem with your commit: web-uri.test contained
> some tests that assumed lowercase percent encoding. I took the liberty
> of modifying your commit to fix those tests, and then pushed it to
> stable-2.0.
Hi Aleix,
There was one remaining problem with your commit: web-uri.test contained
some tests that assumed lowercase percent encoding. I took the liberty
of modifying your commit to fix those tests, and then pushed it to
stable-2.0.
Thanks!
Mark
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Aleix,
>
> This patch looks good to me, except that I don't like the variable name
> 'num' for a string. Actually, I'm not sure we need to bind that to a
> variable at all. How about just wrapping 'string-upcase' around the
> call to 'nu
Hi Aleix,
This patch looks good to me, except that I don't like the variable name
'num' for a string. Actually, I'm not sure we need to bind that to a
variable at all. How about just wrapping 'string-upcase' around the
call to 'number->string'?
Thanks,
Mark
> @@ -396,11 +396,12
This patch changes the way uri-encode does percent-encoding. The
hexadecimal characters are now uppercase as suggested by RFC3986. So,
(uri-encode "/")
=> %2F
Aleix
uri-encode-uppercase.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi..i installed it on archlinux and when i write into guile prompt i get:
guile> (use-modules (nala shell))
Backtrace:
In standard input:
1: 0* (use-modules (nala shell))
1: 1 (eval-case (# # *unspecified*) (else #))
1: 2 (begin (process-use-modules (list (list #))) *unspecified*)
In u
I didn't use su aldow i am using a root user as default..so i also start
guile using root user..
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 08:44 +0200, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
> > Hi..i installed it on archlinux and when i write into guile prompt i
> > get:
>
> > g
This patch allows uri-encode to uppercase the percent-encoded part. So,
(uri-encode "/")
=> %2f
(uri-encode "/" #:uppercase #t)
=> %2F
Aleix
uri-encode-uppercase.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi William and thanks for your mail!
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:21 AM, William ML Leslie <
william.leslie@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 06:15, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As I told you in an earlier mail I'm back cleaning up and reworking
> > guile-log and
> >
That's great! Thanks a lot for doing so much RTL stuff.
Noah
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> A brief note to say that (system vm disassembler) in wip-rtl now has a
> functioning "disassemble-program" that finds function bounds using the
> ELF symbol table. It's not great y
On May 1, 2013, at 01:10, Daniel Llorens wrote:
> In the ra0 branch, that still fails, and this also fails:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> #1b@1(#t #t)
> While compiling expression:
> ERROR: In procedure uniform-array->bytevector: Wrong type (expecting uniform
> contiguous array): #1b@1(#t #t)
I hav
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:31 +0200, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
> I didn't use su aldow i am using a root user as default..so i also
> start guile using root user..
>
Could you checkout if the path `guile -c (display (car %load-path))'
have nala directory?
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nala Ginrut
Here's the implementation in Artanis, and all the constant like
PROT_READ definition are ignored:
-- code -
(define *libc-ffi* (dynamic-link))
(define %mmap
(pointer->procedure '*
(dynamic-func "mmap" *libc-ffi*)
(list
On 30 April 2013 06:15, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As I told you in an earlier mail I'm back cleaning up and reworking
> guile-log and
> refreshing the memory of the inner details of that code base enabled me to
> rewrite
> the spec for redo safe variables considerable. I think t
A brief note to say that (system vm disassembler) in wip-rtl now has a
functioning "disassemble-program" that finds function bounds using the
ELF symbol table. It's not great yet; would like to work on it a bit
more this evening, but it's better than what we had ;)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 08:44 +0200, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
> Hi..i installed it on archlinux and when i write into guile prompt i
> get:
> guile> (use-modules (nala shell))
> Backtrace:
> In standard input:
>1: 0* (use-modules (nala shell))
>1: 1 (eval-case (# # *unspecified*) (else #))
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
