On 10 October 2012 11:25, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Daniel Hartwig writes:
>
>> On 10 October 2012 10:14, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>> Your latest patch looks good, but I just remembered one more thing:
>>> doc/ref/api-data.texi needs to be updated.
>>
>> I had assumed that was updated automatically fr
Daniel Hartwig writes:
> On 10 October 2012 10:14, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Your latest patch looks good, but I just remembered one more thing:
>> doc/ref/api-data.texi needs to be updated.
>
> I had assumed that was updated automatically from the doc strings,
> which are in the right format.
No
On 10 October 2012 10:14, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Your latest patch looks good, but I just remembered one more thing:
> doc/ref/api-data.texi needs to be updated.
I had assumed that was updated automatically from the doc strings,
which are in the right format.
?
Hi Ludovic!
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> As incredible as it may seem, ‘hash’ until now always returned 263 % n
> for structs, leading to interesting experiences when using structs as
> hash table keys.
Yes, do you remember us talking about this long ago on IRC? I wanted to
fix this,
Daniel Hartwig writes:
> On 10 October 2012 01:48, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Please drop the unneeded curly braces above.
>
> Are guile's macros safe to always use that way?
They should be. If they aren't, that's a bug IMO.
> In libguile/__scm.h
> the SCM_ASSERT definition is conditional on SCM_
On 10 October 2012 01:48, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> + if (!SCM_CHARSETP (char_pred))
>> {
>> - last_idx = idx;
>> - while (idx > 0 && buf[idx-1] != SCM_CHAR(chr))
>> -idx--;
>> - if (idx >= 0)
>> -{
>> - res = scm_cons (sc
Hello!
As incredible as it may seem, ‘hash’ until now always returned 263 % n
for structs, leading to interesting experiences when using structs as
hash table keys.
The attached patch provides a simple hasher for structs.
I’ll commit it within a few days if there are no objections.
Ludo’.
diff
Hi,
And now with the patch.
Mark H Weaver skribis:
>> FAIL: ftw.test: file-system-fold: test-suite (never enter)
>> FAIL: ftw.test: file-system-fold: test-suite/lib.scm (flat file)
>> FAIL: ftw.test: scandir: no select
>> FAIL: ports.test: %file-port-name-canonicalization: absolute
>> canonica
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
>> FAIL: ftw.test: file-system-fold: test-suite (never enter)
>> FAIL: ftw.test: file-system-fold: test-suite/lib.scm (flat file)
>> FAIL: ftw.test: scandir: no select
>> FAIL: ports.test: %file-port-name-canonicalization: absolute
>> canonicalization from ice-9
Can
Hi Mark!
Makes sense to me, you can apply it.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Hi Daniel,
The updated patch looks good except for a few minor nitpicks:
Daniel Hartwig writes:
> From 46178db9eecc9ca402d9571c3ee520074f15ef5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Daniel Hartwig
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:35:00 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] In string-split, add support for character se
11 matches
Mail list logo