Yellow,
On Tue 26 Jan 2010 23:29, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> By "dynamic", I mean that you don't have to write C and compile it; you
>> can do everything at runtime from Scheme. You use dynamic-func and
>> dynamic-link to get the raw function pointer, and make-foreign-function
>> t
Hej,
On Tue 26 Jan 2010 23:15, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think things like ‘uniform-vector-read’ should be discouraged rather
> than deprecated, since it matches the definition in ‘discouraged.h’:
>
>A discouraged feature is one that shouldn't be used in new code
>since w
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> I just finished up some work to make a dynamic foreign function
> interface. This is on the wip-ffi branch.
Nice!
> By "dynamic", I mean that you don't have to write C and compile it; you
> can do everything at runtime from Scheme. You use dynamic-func and
> dynamic
Hello!
I think things like ‘uniform-vector-read’ should be discouraged rather
than deprecated, since it matches the definition in ‘discouraged.h’:
A discouraged feature is one that shouldn't be used in new code
since we have a better alternative now. However, there is nothing
wrong with
Hello,
Somehow the CSS we use must have changed recently and the web page looks
ugly now: http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ .
Any takers? :-)
Ludo’.
Hey all,
I just finished up some work to make a dynamic foreign function
interface. This is on the wip-ffi branch.
By "dynamic", I mean that you don't have to write C and compile it; you
can do everything at runtime from Scheme. You use dynamic-func and
dynamic-link to get the raw function pointe
Hi,
On Tue 26 Jan 2010 15:35, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> have I managed to convince you that we should have these by
>> default? :)
>
> Well, yes. :-)
Rereading my mail I have to apologize for the "hard sell". I do think
`library' and `import' in the defau
Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
[...]
> Beyond that, we're just talking about two identifiers.
[...]
> Yes, the names are a burden on the namespace, but I don't think they're
> "creeping", in the sense that they will expand in the future.
>
> If you're dead-set against r6rs support by default, that
Greets,
On Mon 25 Jan 2010 18:37, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Sun 24 Jan 2010 18:53, Julian Graham writes:
>>
>>> One point that may be of interest is that I've chosen to provide the
>>> code in the form of R6RS libraries rather than Guile modules.
>
> Th
Hi Ludo,
On Tue 26 Jan 2010 00:13, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> It seems that currently SIMPLE is for all pr *or* all pw slots.
>
> Fixed:
Cool :)
>> Then perhaps we can change SIMPLE_RW to be MUTABLE or something, to
>> indicate that all slots of this object are mutable.
>
> I end
10 matches
Mail list logo
