Hi Ludo, On Tue 26 Jan 2010 00:13, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> It seems that currently SIMPLE is for all pr *or* all pw slots. > > Fixed: Cool :) >> Then perhaps we can change SIMPLE_RW to be MUTABLE or something, to >> indicate that all slots of this object are mutable. > > I ended up keeping the name ‘SIMPLE_RW’ because in theory there could be > non-‘p’ mutable fields, i.e., non-simple structs with mutable fields, > which aren’t interesting. Wellll, not right now, no; but SIMPLE | MUTABLE is the same as your current semantics of SIMPLE_RW. I can imagine MUTABLE being useful on its own. But no, it's not useful right now, and should it become useful, we can play some #define trickery. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
