Hi Ken,
I've been trying to reproduce the guardian finalisation problem that you
see with SCM_DEBUG==1 but, like Ludovic, I haven't had any luck. With
SCM_DEBUG=1 for the whole build (plus the SCM_GC_MARK_P change), I'm
afraid my machine grinds to a halt when it gets to goops.c - i.e. it
never fi
Hi Ludo,
> Andy is the expert, but I think such a patch can’t hurt, so please do!
Done! See attached.
Regards,
Julian
From 48128b32d7f9d9613e46b61a3c695d786152fb67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Graham
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:56:13 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in psyntax.scm relat
Andy Wingo writes:
> 2) Make sure Mark's patch is in
>
> If Neil gets to this one first, that's fine :) But it needs to go
> in, so that
Have I missed this? I _think_ I'm still waiting for Mark's updated
patch...
Many apologies in advance if I have missed it!
Regards,
Neil
Hello!
Julian Graham writes:
> I'm no psyntax expert, but it looks like there's a minor typo in our
> psyntax implementation. In psyntax.scm, at line 1325 (in
> `chi-macro'), the expression:
>
> (syntax-violation #f "encountered raw symbol in macro output"
> (source-wrap e w s mod) x)
>
> ...sh
Hi Guilers,
I'm no psyntax expert, but it looks like there's a minor typo in our
psyntax implementation. In psyntax.scm, at line 1325 (in
`chi-macro'), the expression:
(syntax-violation #f "encountered raw symbol in macro output"
(source-wrap e w s mod) x)
...should read:
(syntax-violation #f
Hi-
If I start up an interactive session with the current master, and I
enter the following three lines at the prompt
(use-modules (ice-9 readline))
(activate-readline)
I get an infinite loop of
ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #
Thanks,
Mike
Hello!
Once upon a time, if ‘chbouib.go’ is in the vicinity of ‘chbouib.scm’,
then ‘(use-modules (chbouib))’ would load ‘chbouib.go’. This is no
longer the case, but can be remedied with something like this:
diff --git a/libguile/load.c b/libguile/load.c
index 50af256..194d1e5 100644
--- a/libgu
Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
> My only concern is with bytevectors. It should be possible to map a
> bytevector to an existing range of memory, for read-write access. That
> implies a pointer indirection. We can optimize for the inline case by
> doing something like:
>
>++--+-+.
Hi Ludo,
On Tue 06 Oct 2009 23:49, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> - bdw-gc-static-alloc (need to grep through sources to estimate the
> amount of breakage it would cause)
Neat :)
My only concern is with bytevectors. It should be possible to map a
bytevector to an existing range
My todo list, for the record:
1) Finish case-lambda branch -- should be a day or two's work there
This doesn't necessarily imply that all the new features
(case-lambda, lambda*, ...) are fully baked, but the VM, debugging,
and IL support for the features should be mergeable and d
On Fri 16 Oct 2009 00:31, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 1.9.4.
Thanks for doing the release, again! :-)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi Mike,
On Tue 06 Oct 2009 23:35, Mike Gran writes:
>> From: Andy Wingo
>> Subject: frozen!
>
> I need to roll back the changes made to i18n.c
> that made locale-specific case conversion of strings
> work on GNU but break on Darwin. Locale-specific
> case conversion of strings works, but only
12 matches
Mail list logo