Hello! Julian Graham <jool...@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm no psyntax expert, but it looks like there's a minor typo in our > psyntax implementation. In psyntax.scm, at line 1325 (in > `chi-macro'), the expression: > > (syntax-violation #f "encountered raw symbol in macro output" > (source-wrap e w s mod) x) > > ...should read: > > (syntax-violation #f "encountered raw symbol in macro output" > (source-wrap e w (wrap-subst w) mod) x) > > ...since `s' is not actually in scope I actually noticed that when testing ‘-Wunbound-variable’: ice-9/psyntax-pp.scm:1089:38: warning: possibly unbound variable `s' But I didn’t take the time to investigate, so I’m glad you did. :-) > -- which, with the former code, generates an error that obscures the > actual syntax violation. I can prepare a patch if people want. Andy is the expert, but I think such a patch can’t hurt, so please do! Thanks, Ludo’.
