Kevin Ryde escreveu:
> I've struck, in 1.8, port-for-each passing a freed cell to its iterator
> func. Eg. "guile -s foo.scm" on
Hi,
Please see the patch attached. Comments welcome.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
diff --git a/libguile/fports.c b/libgu
Hi Ludovic,
On Sat 25 Aug 2007 10:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> By the way, what does that option actually do. The manual just says
>> "Copy source code expressions", which doesn't leave me any the wiser.
>
> This has to do with unmemoization when debugging: a copy of the
>
Greg Troxel escreveu:
> The more serious problem with guile is a lack of focus on timely, stable
> releases usable by people who want to integrate it. Plus backwards
> compatibility so that people that do integrated it have very little
> grief, and the current slib mess.
I have switched from CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> If there must be a switch, I'd also say that subversion is probably the best
> way to go.
> Less culture shock for long time cvs users. Windows people aren't left out.
> Guile doesn't
> really need the massively distributed model that the Linux kernel requires.
A
Kevin Ryde escreveu:
> (This got me wondering why there's a port table anyway, instead of
> independent objects with say a weak hash table for the "list of all
> ports" needed by port-for-each and flush-all. Historical reasons I
> suppose.)
I'm hacking at a patch to junk the table for a weak hash
Andy Wingo escreveu:
>> How about switching from CVS to Git [0]?
>
> The advantages you list are compelling. It is especially good that
> savannah supports git. I have only two points to counter: (1) git sucks
> to use (but somehow many people seem to manage), and (2) git does not
> work on window
Dan McMahill escreveu:
> Another project I'm on has switched to git from cvs and I'm bringing up
> the rear in terms of trying to learn the tool enough to use it without
> making a mess of things. My biggest complaint, aside from having to
> learn another tool, is that git is not really a lightwei
Kevin Ryde escreveu:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> How about switching from CVS to Git [0]?
>
> I would say no. All these other revision systems seem to come and go,
> but their supposed features rarely seem to justify the learning curve
> (the frequently steep, time consuming,
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Han-Wen did a full import of the CVS history into Git some time ago [1].
> Note that it preserves tags and branches. This Git repository is kept
> in sync with CVS using a cron job that runs on Han-Wen's machine.
Note that I messed up the name conversion in the histo
Hi,
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By the way, what does that option actually do. The manual just says
> "Copy source code expressions", which doesn't leave me any the wiser.
This has to do with unmemoization when debugging: a copy of the
unmemoized expression is attached to the sourc
Hi,
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is if other libraries do the same thing, ie. put an
> strcasecmp in. I expect you get clashes that'd stop an application
> using certain combinations of libraries, or getting mis-detections of
> what's available where, etc.
>
> For namespa
11 matches
Mail list logo
