[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: > If there must be a switch, I'd also say that subversion is probably the best > way to go. > Less culture shock for long time cvs users. Windows people aren't left out. > Guile doesn't > really need the massively distributed model that the Linux kernel requires.
Actually, try this for a data point: git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git cd lilypond; gitk what you will see is the history of LilyPond, which is not massively distributed by any standard. If you press page down a couple of time, you will see 'parallel' development and merging of several topics, eg. - Spacing features by Joe Neeman - Release fixes by me - translation updates by John Mandereau and helpers - doc updates by Graham Percival and helpers these all happen in parallel. In particular, I am the release coordinator, and I always make releases which are effectively branches. This means that I can make small fixes (eg. a make dist failure) to build a release locally and merge them back into the repository HEAD later. My releases are not inconvenienced by large hacks that are pushed to the HEAD. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
