Re: Improved (and faster) reader

Hi, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >> +scm_read_quote (int chr, SCM port) > > I think you may have lost source properties from quote and quasi-quote > forms, > > (read-enable 'positions) > (source-properties (read (open-input-st

Re: cell heap usage in 1.8 vs 1.6

Hey, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ah yes, it's better there. As good as 1.6? > What bit is the operative fix? I couldn't find exactly. The ChangeLog entry on 2006-01-04 gives some hints about functions to look at. There's also this post: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-de

Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep

Hi, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually I see the flush func of a soft port is entirely unused, it's > never called by a force-output because nothing is ever put in the port > buffer as such. The manual could be clearer about what it's supposed to > be for :-(. Maybe that's a bug,