Hey, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah yes, it's better there. As good as 1.6? > What bit is the operative fix? I couldn't find exactly. The ChangeLog entry on 2006-01-04 gives some hints about functions to look at. There's also this post: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-12/msg00095.html . > Both the per-freelist min_yield adjust and the counting in > scm_i_sweep_all_segments look likely. (Though it still all looks > complicated, and sprayed around a dozen functions :-( Hopefully removal of globals made it slightly simpler to follow... Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
