another merge from 1.8

2007-01-15 Thread Kevin Ryde
I did another dreaded merge from the 1.8 onto the head. Insert the usual whinge, but the specifics this time are: * If it's going to be utf-8 for the changelogs then please make that change in 1.8 too or merges are going to go haywire. * Are the hpux ia64 bits meant to be in 1.8? If it's a po

Re: doc scm_set_program_arguments

2007-01-15 Thread Kevin Ryde
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is argv normally NULL-terminated? Yes, if it's from main(). > I would have thought that "argc-i" would be more reliable than "-1" > here. I guess it's clearer to use one method or the other (not a mixture). I changed it to below (with set-program-argum

Re: set-program-arguments from scheme

2007-01-15 Thread Kevin Ryde
Incidentally, I called the scheme func "scm_set_program_arguments_scm", because plain "scm_set_program_arguments" is taken by the C interface. ___ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel

Re: set-program-arguments from scheme

2007-01-15 Thread Kevin Ryde
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > (I wondered about (set-program-arguments . lst) instead of > (set-program-arguments lst), but I suspect cases where you already > have a list in hand will be more common.) Yes, especially if you got it from a (program-arguments) call. >> +"Progr