Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > (I wondered about (set-program-arguments . lst) instead of > (set-program-arguments lst), but I suspect cases where you already > have a list in hand will be more common.)
Yes, especially if you got it from a (program-arguments) call. >> + "Program arguments are held in a fluid and therefore have a\n" >> + "separate value in each Guile thread.") > > That's surprising; why is that? Tell me and we'll both know :). scm_boot_guile can be called in each thread with a different argc+argv, I suppose. I guess it lets you run each thread like it's a separate program, though that sounds like an unusual way to work. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
