Oops, I see opendir doesn't record the opened directoryname. Hmm. It
might be easiest for now to just stick a mutex around plain readdir()
and worry later about readdir_r and its buffer size.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lis
"Bill Schottstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I found some examples by Googling for readdir_r and _PC_NAME_MAX.
Incomplete bit of code below, it's not pretty but I guess it's what
has to be done.
#if HAVE_READDIR_R
/* On Solaris 2.7, struct dirent only contains "char d_name[1]" and the
Yes, here's the relevent portion of man readdir_r:
The caller must allocate storage pointed to by entry to be
large enough for a dirent structure with an array of char
d_name member containing at least NAME_MAX (that is,
pathconf(directory, _PC_NAME_MAX)) plus on
"Bill Schottstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (The d_name field is still defined to be 1 char long, so I think the
> glibc comment still pertains to Solaris,
I guess that means you can't just define a struct. What does the
readdir_r man page say you should do? pathconf like you said?
___
I don't think NAME_MAX is defined anywhere -- the documentation says
you should use pathconf instead. Here's the portion of limits.h where
they commented out NAME_MAX:
/*
* POSIX 1003.1a, section 2.9.5, table 2-5 contains [NAME_MAX] and the
* related text states:
*
* A definition of one of th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> Note: I'm not sure what to do with `assert ()'.
"Don't do that", to coin a phrase.
> Perhaps we should define our own macro somewhere?
The `if' you put, with an fprintf stderr, should be fine.
___
Guile
"Bill Schottstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> filesys.c:860: error: `NAME_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> union {
> struct dirent ent;
> char pad1 [sizeof(struct dirent) + NAME_MAX];
> char pad2 [offsetof (struct dirent, d_name) + NAME_MAX + 1];
This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> BTW, I'd strongly recommend using SHA1 sums (e.g., via `sha1sum', part
> of GNU Coreutils) rather than MD5.
Yeah, that's probably best.
> See the example at http://www.cits.rub.de/MD5Collisions/ if in
> doubt. ;-)
Well, they get to choose both text
I was trying to build the new guile on a MacIntel box, got this error in gmp:
tmp-dive_1.s:98:invalid character '@' in first operand
make[2]: *** [dive_1.lo] Error 1
I sent a bug report to the gmp bug list and got this reply:
Date: 13 Feb 2006 17:26:45 +0100
From: Torbjorn Granl
Hi,
The patch below fixes `scm_i_take_stringbufn ()' so that it registers
the right amount of collectable memory. Failing to do so, an underflow
was triggered in `decrease_mtrigger ()' (when decreasing
SCM_MALLOCATED), resulting in a weird behavior (typically: fast increase
in memory consumption
In Linux FC4 dual x86-64, trying to build Guile 1.7.91 I get:
creating guile
cat alist.doc arbiters.doc async.doc backtrace.doc boolean.doc chars.doc
continuations.doc
debug.doc deprecation.doc deprecated.doc discouraged.doc dynl.doc dynwind.doc
environments
.doc eq.doc error.doc eval.doc evale
In solaris 10, I think the readdir_r usage is incorrect.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-MT filesys.lo -MD -
MP -MF .deps/filesy
s.Tpo -c filesys.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/filesys.o
filesys.c: In function `scm_readdir':
filesys.c:860: error: `NAME_MAX'
Hi,
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are pleased to announce the release of Guile 1.7.91. This is a
> release candidate for Guile 1.8. It can be found here:
>
> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.7.91.tar.gz
FYI, on `powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu', everything seems to work fi
Hi,
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, I'm inclined not to put this into 1.8, at least not in 1.8.0. I
> can't really put my finger on it, as I see nothing fundamental wrong
> with the patch, but I also don't see the immediate need for it. That
> is probably because I haven't fol
Hello,
I'm resending the GC-cleanup patch in a hopefully more readable form.
Han-Wen: let me know if it's alright.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
>> void
>>-scm_i_adjust_min_yield (scm_t_cell_type_statistics *freelist)
>>+scm_i_adjust_mi
15 matches
Mail list logo
