compile glib success but failure on run-time with every version

Hello, I'm working on series of Visual Studio 2013 solutions and projects on GitHub to compile GTK+ stack and it's dependencies from scratch, beginning with zlib and iconv up to GTK+ and even gtkmm. So far I succeeded to compile everyt

Re: compile glib success but failure on run-time with every version

age in a particular form that is affected > by that preprocessor define. > > Hope this clears it up for you. > > With blessings. > > -- > * From: * codekiddy ; > * To: * ; > * Subject: * compile glib success but failure on run-time wit

Re: compile glib success but failure on run-time with every version

in a particular form that is affected > by that preprocessor define. > > Hope this clears it up for you. > > With blessings. > > -- > * From: * codekiddy ; > * To: * ; > * Subject: * compile glib success but failure on run-time with every > versio

Re: compile glib success but failure on run-time with every version

Feb 12, 2015 at 7:19 AM, codekiddy wrote: > >> Hello again, I would just like to say that "I think" I found a problem in >> gio.dll >> >> I Created created a test project for glib, gio and gobject, for >> glib-2.42.1 package where gio test fails in following

Re: compile glib success but failure on run-time with every version

which is based on Fan's tutorial and graph from your site, and would like to hear what you guys think about it: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/codekiddy2/Visual-Studio-gtkmm/Redesign/projects/Readme/dependency-graph.png Thank you for your kind responses! ~codekiddy On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:

Is Unicode character set a problem when compiling GTK sources?

lems with GTK+ on run-time, there should be reason why those projects found in official sources are all set to Multibyte?? Thank you! ~codekiddy ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: Is Unicode character set a problem when compiling GTK sources?

Thanks Arnavion, re-compiling glib, pango and gtk with Multibyte and then re-linking dependent DLL's did not solve anything. stack overflow in gobject.dll damn bug is somewhere, but it denies to show it self. [?] On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Arnavion wrote: > (Re-adding codekiddy an

always the same crash in g_cclosure_marshal_generic_va

with libffi and my architecture or something I have no idea, please help me out with this, give me some hint what to do? Thank you so much! ~codekiddy ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: always the same crash in g_cclosure_marshal_generic_va

gtkmm are now fully working and fully tested. found on GitHub https://github.com/codekiddy2/Visual-Studio-gtkmm Thank You! On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 3:23 AM, codekiddy wrote: > Hi, I'm still struggling with GTK+ compilation and it looks I found a > problem (or bug) but I'm not sure

Source ID 2 was not found when attempting to remove it

what to do to resolve this? Thank you! ~codekiddy ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: GLib-GIO-ERROR **: No GSettings are installed on the system

Hello Kuznecov!, You also need to copy *share\glib-2.0\schemas\** also schemas should be compiled, there should be a file named *gschemas.compiled *inside the schemas folder. Hope that solves your problem. ~codekiddy On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Гриша Кузнецов wrote: > Hello) > I w

Announcement of Visual Studio 2015 projects and solutions for Gtkmm and GTK+

There is also an updated Visual Studio gtkmm wiki <https://github.com/codekiddy2/Visual-Studio-gtkmm/wiki> to help beginners building gtkmm from scratch. Any possible updates will be pushed to msvc-140 branch, up to next release of Visual Studio. Thank you! ~codekiddy __

Re: Announcement of Visual Studio 2015 projects and solutions for Gtkmm and GTK+

lot of stuff to do with current status as you can see. Thank you for feedback! On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Miroslav Rajcic wrote: > Looks nice, it's appreciated very much! > Any chance to add GtkSourceView library in the mix ? > > Regards, > Miroslav > > On 27

Re: Announcement of Visual Studio 2015 projects and solutions for Gtkmm and GTK+

;>> Looks nice, it's appreciated very much! >>> Any chance to add GtkSourceView library in the mix ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Miroslav >>> >>> >>> On 27.11.2015. 7:59, codekiddy wrote: >>> >>> Hello there! &

Re: Announcement of Visual Studio 2015 projects and solutions for Gtkmm and GTK+

t any help would be appreciated. >> >> Cheers. >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Miroslav Rajcic > > wrote: >> >>> Looks nice, it's appreciated very much! >>> Any chance to add GtkSourceView library in the mix ? >>> >>>

Re: Announcement of Visual Studio 2015 projects and solutions for Gtkmm and GTK+

VS might have hard time to learn how to debug possible build errors with cmake. I know it's possible to generate Solutions with cmake, but making build system with VS just goes faster (for me at least). On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:15 AM, LRN wrote: > On 27.11.2015 9:59, codekid

Re: Announcement of Visual Studio 2015 projects and solutions for Gtkmm and GTK+

Cumming wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 07:59 +0100, codekiddy wrote: > > Hello there! > > > > I'm glad to be able to announce new release of Visual Studio 2015 > > projects and solutions to compile GTK+, Gtkmm, all it's dependencies > > solely by using Visua

Re: Announcement of Visual Studio 2015 projects and solutions for Gtkmm and GTK+

validate actions done in projects before submitting any patches. On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 09:55 +0100, codekiddy wrote: > > Sure, why not, Actually I used these as a starting point, I'll be > > glad to contribute! > >

Re: Compiling 'C' source using glib-2.0 with #include

glib-2.0 folder needs to be added to the compiler includes search ex: *-isystem**glib-2.0* or *-I/path/to/**glib-2.0* On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Timothy Ward wrote: > Whilst using gcc to compile some "c" source using glib-2.0 and using > #INCLUDE is not found but is found. > > The prob