On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 15:16 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
> > When do we run the update_mirrors.sh script? Do we even use it any more?
>
> hm, i guess only Owen would know.
> looks like it updates mirrors_list.html in gtk-web, which actually gets
> installed as http://gtk.org/mirrors_list.html. however
On 4/30/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
> > Tim Janik wrote:
> gtk-doc.sgml? there's no such file, did you mean gtk-faq.sgml?
> that is part of the gtk+ module so it gets shipped together with
> gtk, and given the right sgml tools, also gets b
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Tim Janik wrote:
>> not sure what you're asking for here...
>> changes to the gtk-web module should be documented in the ChangeLog,
>> and install.sh is used to update the web site after commits to the
>> gtk-web module. (technically, a copy of install
Tim Janik wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
>> Martyn Russell wrote:
>
>>> Improvements:
>>> =
>>> ÿÿ I would like to add MAINTAINERS and README files with all the
>>> important information that is needed for the upkeep and running of this
>>> module. Is there anyt
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
Martyn Russell wrote:
Improvements:
=
ÿÿ I would like to add MAINTAINERS and README files with all the
important information that is needed for the upkeep and running of this
module. Is there anything that people would want included in he
Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi,
Just a progress up date really and a few requests.
First of all, I have tagged the revision of gtk-web BEFORE the changes
below and it can be found here:
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gtk-web/tags/pre-changes-april-07/
> Cleanups:
> =
> • Some of the .html files
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:39 -0400, Tim Janik wrote:
>> with the current state of the gtk.org machine and limited available HD space,
>> i'd not dare to change the web system for www.gtk.org. the Gimp project has
>> cleared the necessary money for setti
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:39 -0400, Tim Janik wrote:
> with the current state of the gtk.org machine and limited available HD space,
> i'd not dare to change the web system for www.gtk.org. the Gimp project has
> cleared the necessary money for setting up a new machine, Manish Singh is
> supposed to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Martyn Russell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently commented on the mailing list [1] about improving the GTK+
>> web site so that .html files don't include formatting. The idea was to
>> make it easier for developers and anyone else contributing patches to
>
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 21:15 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Does anyone have a view on this?
the GNOME web team recently did a breakdown of CMS for the GNOME web
sites[1], and the choose Plone[2]. so I'd really like, for sake of
consistency and maintenance, that gtk.org used the same CMS.
ciao,
Behdad Esfahbod skrev:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 16:15 -0400, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
>> Jeff volunteered to help set up gtk.org with moinmoin [2] and
>> mentioned that http://www.pango.org/ and http://www.gnome-db.org/ currently
>> use
>> that particular Wiki. My personal view of it, is that it
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 16:15 -0400, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
> Jeff volunteered to help set up gtk.org with moinmoin [2] and
> mentioned
> that http://www.pango.org/ and http://www.gnome-db.org/ currently use
> that particular Wiki. My personal view of it, is that it seems
> somewhat
> simplistic an
Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently commented on the mailing list [1] about improving the GTK+
> web site so that .html files don't include formatting. The idea was to
> make it easier for developers and anyone else contributing patches to
> focus on content and not have to worry about styl
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:02 -0400, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
> > What about refreshing gtk logo in the process ?
>
> I was thinking this too.
>
> > I gave it a shot but I'm sure many talented people could give a
> better
> > proposition.
>
> Actually, I quite like it - what do others think?
Add
On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am thinking of doing this in 2 stages:
>
> 1. Remove all the unnecessary files and have a general clean up and
> reorganise.
> 2. Restyle the site.
I can't wait for those updates. I also don't have too much time but
please state if you want
On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christophe Dehais wrote:
> > On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Questions:
> >> ==
> >> • Does anyone else have any further suggestions at this stage?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > What about refreshing gtk logo in the
Christophe Dehais wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Questions:
>> ==
>> • Does anyone else have any further suggestions at this stage?
>>
>>
>
> What about refreshing gtk logo in the process ?
I was thinking this too.
> I gave it a shot but I'm sure man
On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Questions:
==
• Does anyone else have any further suggestions at this stage?
What about refreshing gtk logo in the process ?
I gave it a shot but I'm sure many talented people could give a better
proposition.
Christophe
gtk-lo
hey Martyn,
what you say overall sounds good to me, so please get started on your ideas.
i'll just comment on the sections where i see/find a slightly different angle.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
ÿÿ Can we remove these unused or unlinked (no href) top level .html
files?
ÿÿ s
Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:52 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
>> i'd guess so, unless someone actually objects...
>> have you used google to search for any external references to these
>> links that indicate they could be worth keeping?
>>
Tim Janik wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
>> I spent some time looking into the structure of the gtk-web SVN module
>> to familiarise myself and formulate some questions, so before I continue:
>
> rock, thanks for signiing up for the task at http://live.gnome.org/GtkTasks
>
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:52 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
> i'd guess so, unless someone actually objects...
> have you used google to search for any external references to these
> links that indicate they could be worth keeping?
> e.g. see:
>http://www.g
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
I recently commented on the mailing list [1] about improving the GTK+
web site so that .html files don't include formatting. The idea was to
make it easier for developers and anyone else contributing patches to
focus on content and not have to worr
Hi,
I recently commented on the mailing list [1] about improving the GTK+
web site so that .html files don't include formatting. The idea was to
make it easier for developers and anyone else contributing patches to
focus on content and not have to worry about style. For a while now, I
have thought
24 matches
Mail list logo
