On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:52 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martyn Russell wrote:
> i'd guess so, unless someone actually objects... > have you used google to search for any external references to these > links that indicate they could be worth keeping? > e.g. see: > http://www.google.de/search?as_lq=www.gtk.org%2Fsetuid.html > > that is, the setuid page *definitely* has to be kept. that is an ever > recurring question and documents an important design decision. It also is linked to in a warning in the GTK+ sources that a user gets if they try to run GTK+ setuid. - Owen _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
