After taking a look at some glib code I found a way to do what I wanted. The
same logic is used in glib so I'm pretty confident I'm doing the right thing
and I have attached a patch to the bug report.
Federico it would be great if you could take a look at this when you get a
spare minute.
T
Thanks Colomban, these are two good points. But I still think its not a great
solution to cripple systems that do have gvfs-fuse avaiable just because some
other system might not have local mounts for remote locations. Is there any
easy way for GTK to test for the avaliblity of gvfs-fuse and set
Le 16/11/2012 23:53, Timothy Arceri a écrit :
> Hi Guys, I'm after feedback on whether you guys think this is a good
> idea. For background I have been investigating bug
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586367
>
> Basically what I've found is that gtk_file_chooser_set_local_only()
> is
Hi Guys,
I'm after feedback on whether you guys think this is a good idea.
For background I have been investigating bug
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586367
Basically what I've found is that gtk_file_chooser_set_local_only() is set to
TRUE by default. This makes sense
The breaking of mouse wheel support in gtk+ 3.4 also comes to mind.
(Bug 675089 and others, I'm sure.)
Morten
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 12:55 -0800, Matthew Brush wrote:
> Any chance of reverting/fixing those changes?
>
> Here's some related bug reports I could find:
[snip]
Thanks for compiling this list of bugs; it's very helpful!
Please see the thread I started as a reply to Ryan - the "File chooser
rece
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 15:24 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> 3) The file chooser "recent folder" changes that landed in 3.0 and also
> on 2.x.
>
> I consider the last case to be particularly egregious because nothing
> was broken to start with and the changes were highly visible from a UI
> standpo
