Le 16/11/2012 23:53, Timothy Arceri a écrit : > Hi Guys, I'm after feedback on whether you guys think this is a good > idea. For background I have been investigating bug > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586367 > > Basically what I've found is that gtk_file_chooser_set_local_only() > is set to TRUE by default. This makes sense if file_chooser is > returning uri that points directly to the network locations e.g. > smb:///blah, afp://blah, etc as you can't be sure that the > application can handle these protocols. I'm assuming that these uri's > are what was returnedback with gnome-vfs. However, my testing shows > that with gvfs file_chooser returns local locations (that I believe > are FUSE mounted) to the network locations meaning that the > applications are always given a local location and should have no > problem with handling the location. Hence I would assume it would be > safe to set local only to FALSE by default.
I'm not 10000% sure, but I'd say: 1) it requires gvfs-fuse; 2) what about non-Linux platforms? Do they also have local mount for remote locations? Regards, Colomban > > > I guess what I'm after is the GLIB/gvfs guys to tell me if I'm > missing something here? And whether this is a good idea or not. > > Thanks for your time, Tim _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
