Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I will be posting my final review of the gtk.org pages in the coming few
> weeks and I wanted people's opinions on a few things.
>
> 1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org
> site instead of Tor's site? It makes sense to me to have
Seems I didn't get all details of Behdad's algorithm.
Fixed. Like it much better now:
http://taschenorakel.de/media/movies/natural-size-behdad-style.ogg
TODO:
- get size-group-natural-size interaction halfway right.
- get agreement on code/API (commit?)
- factor out Behdad's/Havoc's natural size
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 15:05 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I will be posting my final review of the gtk.org pages in the coming few
> weeks and I wanted people's opinions on a few things.
>
> 1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org
> site instead of Tor'
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> 1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org
>> site instead of Tor's site? It makes sense to me to have it there. Tor,
>> any input here?
>
> The binaries *are* on ftp.gtk.org (actually more completely on
> ftp.gnome.org). With my "site" you probab
GTK+ 2.12.4 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.12/
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.12/
gtk+-2.12.4.tar.bz2 md5sum: 72e2a930f65667ab86dc46141bbaf9e2
gtk+-2.12.4.tar.gzmd5sum: 56dbe8f97fd7cf2c1fffaf2d1ef18eb3
This is a bug fix release in the 2.12 se
> 1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org
> site instead of Tor's site? It makes sense to me to have it there. Tor,
> any input here?
The binaries *are* on ftp.gtk.org (actually more completely on
ftp.gnome.org). With my "site" you probably mean the
www.gimp.org/win32
Hi all,
I will be posting my final review of the gtk.org pages in the coming few
weeks and I wanted people's opinions on a few things.
1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org
site instead of Tor's site? It makes sense to me to have it there. Tor,
any input here?
2.
Hello Kalle and sorry for bothering you again,
> I've implemented a mockup of how this could go (attached):
Thanks a lot, I am not really familiar with GTK+ and glib (and its
coding style) so this definitivly is really a welcome help. Thanks :)
>
> gtkcairostyle.h:
> gtkcairostyle.c:
> GtkCairoSt
