On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 15:05 +0000, Martyn Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > I will be posting my final review of the gtk.org pages in the coming few > weeks and I wanted people's opinions on a few things. > > 1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org > site instead of Tor's site? It makes sense to me to have it there. Tor, > any input here? > > 2. With regards to the FAQ, is there a burning need to have this in a > docbook format? Currently it is a mess and I am thinking of reforming > it, but before I do, I wonder if we should just put it completely in > HTML and as part of the website. Is there any need for us to put it in > PDF or any other format, really?
HTML is slightly more likely to be kept-up-to-date than DocBook. However, no FAQ is likely to be kept up to date unless it's very easy to edit/comment. > 3. Do we really need a gtk 1.2 FAQ? If not, I will remove the cruft from > the FAQ that is no longer pertinent. Sounds good. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
