Oliver,
Thanks a lot. Its working properly.
Only change that I have made is using gtk_tree_store_append in place of
gtk_tree_model_get_iter_first.
Thanks a lot again.
Regards,
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 21:31 +0200, Olivier Sessink wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 06:30 PM, Rudra Banerjee wrote:
> > Oliver,
> > T
On 09/12/2012 06:30 PM, Rudra Banerjee wrote:
> Oliver,
> Thanks for your reply.
> The problem basically is to pass on the function argument from one to
> other.
you need to create a header file (main.h) that has the enum, and
extern GtkListStore *treestore;
in main.c define GtkListStore *treesto
Oliver,
Thanks for your reply.
The problem basically is to pass on the function argument from one to
other.
So, if I make a more detail, then
In file: main.c I have:
enum
{
COL_FIRST_NAME = 0,
COL_LAST_NAME,
COL_YEAR_BORN,
NUM_COLS
} ;
static GtkTreeModel *
create_and_fill_model (void)
{
On 09/12/2012 12:21 PM, Rudra Banerjee wrote:
[..]
>
> strAuth = gtk_entry_get_text(GTK_ENTRY(e->entryAuth));
> strEditor = gtk_entry_get_text(GTK_ENTRY(e->entryEditor));
>
>
> Is it possible to add these strAuth, strEditor in those treeview's 1st
> and 2nd column?
just acquire an iterato
Dear friends,
I have defined a treeview model as follows:
enum
{
COL_FIRST_NAME = 0,
COL_LAST_NAME,
COL_YEAR_BORN,
NUM_COLS
} ;
static GtkTreeModel *
create_and_fill_model (void)
{
GtkTreeStore *treestore;
GtkTreeItertoplevel, child;
treestore = gtk_tree_store_new(NUM_COLS,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:26:33PM -0400, Eric Pastoor wrote:
> I'm calling the function on the signal connected to row-expand.
That's probably one of the problems, since at that point the exact
heights and locations aren't known yet (these are calculated in an
idle). You might want to use an idl
I'm calling the function on the signal connected to row-expand.
Only the smaller tree is visible to the user because the rest extends
past the viewable area of the scroll. What I mean is that the scroll
bar needs to be scrolled down to see the rows at the bottom. I'm
trying to get just the r
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:26:55PM -0400, Eric Pastoor wrote:
> And I expand on Root so that it looks like
> Root
> --> Sub Tree A
> --> Sub Tree B
> --> Sub Tree C
>
> The result of that get_visible_range function is start:0 end: 0
I get 0 to 0:2 in such cases, which is the correct v
Thanks for the tip. I just tried that though but it doesn't seem to
show what I'm looking for
If I have a tree that starts out like:
Root
And I expand on Root so that it looks like
Root
--> Sub Tree A
--> Sub Tree B
--> Sub Tree C
The result of that get_visible_range function is
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:14:13AM -0400, Eric Pastoor wrote:
> What is the best way to determine if a row of a tree is inside the
> visible part of scrolling window or not? For instance, if I hit the
> expand on a tree item, I'd like to know if a certain child in that
> tree is visible to t
What is the best way to determine if a row of a tree is inside the
visible part of scrolling window or not? For instance, if I hit the
expand on a tree item, I'd like to know if a certain child in that
tree is visible to the user or if it outside of the scrollable
viewing area?
Eric Pasto
11 matches
Mail list logo
